Criminal Liability in Prison Fire Cases: A Case Study of Class I Tangerang Prison Fire

S. Supriyono, Ahmad Yulianto Ihsan
{"title":"Criminal Liability in Prison Fire Cases: A Case Study of Class I Tangerang Prison Fire","authors":"S. Supriyono, Ahmad Yulianto Ihsan","doi":"10.15294/ijcls.v7i1.35669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of Correctional Institutions is part of the criminal system in Indonesia. The criminal law policy which is not yet ideal and the management of prisons that are not optimal have caused over capacity in all prisons. Therefore, in the event of a prison fire disaster, mitigation and rapid evacuation of the inmates cannot be carried out and cause death toll. When there are inmates who die as a result of a prison fire, of course, there must be a party who is responsible politically, sociologically and juridically. This study aims to determine criminal liability in prison fire cases based on the Criminal Code, Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections and other laws and regulations. This research uses normative juridical research method. Based on the results of the study, it can be seen that politically and sociologically those responsible for the fire incident were government officials who handled prison affairs, namely the Minister of Law and Human Rights, the Director General of Corrections, and the head of the prison. While juridically those responsible for the prison fire incident were the perpetrators who were found guilty either by intention or negligence, namely the prison officer for general affairs who handled prison electricity and the prison warden on duty when the fire occurred. To prevent prison fires from causing the inmates to die, it is expected that the government, will improve prison management and carry out criminal law policy reform to improve the criminal system in Indonesia.Keyword: correctional institution; criminal liability; fire","PeriodicalId":129722,"journal":{"name":"IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v7i1.35669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of Correctional Institutions is part of the criminal system in Indonesia. The criminal law policy which is not yet ideal and the management of prisons that are not optimal have caused over capacity in all prisons. Therefore, in the event of a prison fire disaster, mitigation and rapid evacuation of the inmates cannot be carried out and cause death toll. When there are inmates who die as a result of a prison fire, of course, there must be a party who is responsible politically, sociologically and juridically. This study aims to determine criminal liability in prison fire cases based on the Criminal Code, Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections and other laws and regulations. This research uses normative juridical research method. Based on the results of the study, it can be seen that politically and sociologically those responsible for the fire incident were government officials who handled prison affairs, namely the Minister of Law and Human Rights, the Director General of Corrections, and the head of the prison. While juridically those responsible for the prison fire incident were the perpetrators who were found guilty either by intention or negligence, namely the prison officer for general affairs who handled prison electricity and the prison warden on duty when the fire occurred. To prevent prison fires from causing the inmates to die, it is expected that the government, will improve prison management and carry out criminal law policy reform to improve the criminal system in Indonesia.Keyword: correctional institution; criminal liability; fire
监狱火灾案件中的刑事责任——以坦格朗一级监狱火灾为例
惩教机构的存在是印度尼西亚刑事制度的一部分。刑法政策的不完善和监狱管理的不完善造成了各监狱的容量过剩。因此,一旦监狱发生火灾,就无法进行缓解和迅速疏散囚犯,并造成死亡人数。当有囚犯因监狱火灾而死亡时,当然必须有一个在政治、社会和法律上负责的政党。这项研究的目的是根据《刑法》、1995年关于惩戒的第12号法律和其他法律和条例,确定监狱火灾案件中的刑事责任。本研究采用规范的法学研究方法。根据这项研究的结果,可以看出,在政治上和社会上,对火灾事件负有责任的是处理监狱事务的政府官员,即法律和人权部长、惩戒司司长和监狱负责人。在法律上,对监狱火灾事件负有责任的是因故意或疏忽而被判有罪的肇事者,即处理监狱电力的一般事务监狱官员和火灾发生时值班的监狱看守。为了防止监狱火灾造成囚犯死亡,预计政府将改善监狱管理,并进行刑法政策改革,以改善印度尼西亚的刑事制度。关键词:惩教机构;刑事责任;火
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信