Tradition, Empire and the Gold Standard: T. S. Eliot at the Lloyds Bank

Seunghyeok Kweon
{"title":"Tradition, Empire and the Gold Standard: T. S. Eliot at the Lloyds Bank","authors":"Seunghyeok Kweon","doi":"10.14364/t.s.eliot.2023.32.2.1-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In “Tradition and the Individual Talents,” comparing a poet to a catalyst in a chemical reaction, T. S. Eliot suggested that a literary work should be interpreted as an objective or disinterested being which has nothing to do with any political, economical, or social matters. He kept the same critical view on a literary work in some essays, such as “The Perfect Critic,” “The Idea of a Literary Review,” and so on. Following his ideas, most critics have read his literary works as being irrelevant to his personal experiences, his contemporary political events and economic fluctuations. However, it would be interesting to note that while he wrote these essays, he worked for the Lloyds Bank. His experiences at the Lloyds bank sharpened his understanding on the meanings of the political incidents and economic rising and falling. He also integrated his intimate knowledge into his poems such as “A Cooking Egg” and The Waste Land. On the basis of such discoveries, this paper attempts to re-read these poems in his contemporary political, economical contexts.","PeriodicalId":413558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the T. S. Eliot Society of Korea","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the T. S. Eliot Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14364/t.s.eliot.2023.32.2.1-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In “Tradition and the Individual Talents,” comparing a poet to a catalyst in a chemical reaction, T. S. Eliot suggested that a literary work should be interpreted as an objective or disinterested being which has nothing to do with any political, economical, or social matters. He kept the same critical view on a literary work in some essays, such as “The Perfect Critic,” “The Idea of a Literary Review,” and so on. Following his ideas, most critics have read his literary works as being irrelevant to his personal experiences, his contemporary political events and economic fluctuations. However, it would be interesting to note that while he wrote these essays, he worked for the Lloyds Bank. His experiences at the Lloyds bank sharpened his understanding on the meanings of the political incidents and economic rising and falling. He also integrated his intimate knowledge into his poems such as “A Cooking Egg” and The Waste Land. On the basis of such discoveries, this paper attempts to re-read these poems in his contemporary political, economical contexts.
传统、帝国和金本位:t·s·艾略特在劳埃德银行的演讲
t·s·艾略特在《传统与个人才能》中将诗人比作化学反应中的催化剂,他认为文学作品应该被解读为一种客观的、无利害关系的存在,与任何政治、经济或社会事务无关。他在一些随笔中对某一文学作品保持着同样的批评观点,如《完美的批评家》、《文学评论的理念》等。根据他的观点,大多数评论家认为他的文学作品与他的个人经历、他同时代的政治事件和经济波动无关。然而,有趣的是,当他写这些文章时,他在劳埃德银行工作。他在劳埃德银行(Lloyds bank)的经历,加深了他对政治事件和经济起落意义的理解。他还将自己的知识融入到他的诗歌中,如《一个煮熟的鸡蛋》和《荒原》。在这些发现的基础上,本文试图在他当时的政治、经济语境中重新解读这些诗歌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信