MRI validation of Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy Contouring

M. Manji, J. Crook, L. Bartha, R. Rajapakshe
{"title":"MRI validation of Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy Contouring","authors":"M. Manji, J. Crook, L. Bartha, R. Rajapakshe","doi":"10.36811/OJRMI.2019.110001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Level One Evidence has established the indications for, and importance of, adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. Several guidelines have addressed delineation of the prostate bed but with variable specification of the inferior border relative to the penile bulb or to the first CT slice distal to visible urine in the bladder neck. This work determines the correlation between the caudal aspect of the anastomosis shown by the tip of the urethrogram cone and MRI anatomy.\n\nMaterials and Methods :\n\nSixteen patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy following prostatectomy underwent diagnostic MRI in addition to planning CT with Urethrogram. The CT Reference Slice, tip of urethrogram cone and superior aspect of penile bulb were delineated.\n\nResults:\n\nMRI clearly demonstrates the penile bulb but not the anastomosis. In these 16 patients, the tip of the urethrogram cone was a median 3.9 mm cranial to the penile bulb (range 0-10.3 mm).\n\nConclusion: We show marked variability in the distance between penile bulb and the tip of the urethrogram cone. In all sixteen patients, placing the inferior border of the CTV 15mm cranial to the penile bulb would have failed to treat the caudal aspect of the anastomosis, a frequent site of local relapse, that cannot be reliably landmarked by any other anatomic structure. Individualizing the treatment volume to patient anatomy is the only way to ensure consistent coverage without treating a larger than necessary volume in many patients. We recommend the use of planning urethrogram to minimize the potential for geographic miss.","PeriodicalId":132118,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Radiology and Medical Imaging","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Radiology and Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36811/OJRMI.2019.110001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Level One Evidence has established the indications for, and importance of, adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. Several guidelines have addressed delineation of the prostate bed but with variable specification of the inferior border relative to the penile bulb or to the first CT slice distal to visible urine in the bladder neck. This work determines the correlation between the caudal aspect of the anastomosis shown by the tip of the urethrogram cone and MRI anatomy. Materials and Methods : Sixteen patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy following prostatectomy underwent diagnostic MRI in addition to planning CT with Urethrogram. The CT Reference Slice, tip of urethrogram cone and superior aspect of penile bulb were delineated. Results: MRI clearly demonstrates the penile bulb but not the anastomosis. In these 16 patients, the tip of the urethrogram cone was a median 3.9 mm cranial to the penile bulb (range 0-10.3 mm). Conclusion: We show marked variability in the distance between penile bulb and the tip of the urethrogram cone. In all sixteen patients, placing the inferior border of the CTV 15mm cranial to the penile bulb would have failed to treat the caudal aspect of the anastomosis, a frequent site of local relapse, that cannot be reliably landmarked by any other anatomic structure. Individualizing the treatment volume to patient anatomy is the only way to ensure consistent coverage without treating a larger than necessary volume in many patients. We recommend the use of planning urethrogram to minimize the potential for geographic miss.
前列腺切除术后放疗轮廓的MRI验证
一级证据已经确定根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗的适应症和重要性。一些指南已经讨论了前列腺床的划定,但相对于阴茎球或膀胱颈部可见尿液远端的第一个CT切片的下边界有不同的规定。这项工作确定了尿道造影锥尖所显示的吻合端尾侧与MRI解剖之间的相关性。材料与方法:16例前列腺切除术后接受辅助放疗的患者,除计划行CT输尿管造影外,还行MRI诊断。画出CT参考片、尿道锥尖、阴茎球上切面。结果:MRI显示阴茎球清晰,但未见吻合口。在这16例患者中,尿道造影锥尖距阴茎球中位3.9 mm(范围0-10.3 mm)。结论:我们发现阴茎球与尿道锥尖之间的距离有明显的差异。在所有16例患者中,将CTV的下边界放置在阴茎球头部15mm处将无法治疗吻合的尾端,这是一个常见的局部复发部位,不能通过任何其他解剖结构可靠地标记。根据患者解剖结构对治疗量进行个体化是确保一致覆盖的唯一方法,而不会对许多患者进行超过必要量的治疗。我们建议使用计划尿道造影来减少地理缺失的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信