Survey of Requirement Management Techniques for Safety Critical Systems

M. Gillani, A. Ullah, Hafiz Adnan Niaz
{"title":"Survey of Requirement Management Techniques for Safety Critical Systems","authors":"M. Gillani, A. Ullah, Hafiz Adnan Niaz","doi":"10.1109/MACS.2018.8628389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety Critical Systems (SCS) are critical in organizing requirements and that's why needs appropriate requirement engineering. Requirements that are not completely understood and defined are the primary cause for safety related problems. In order to accomplish the task of eliminating chances of mismanaged requirement engineering. We have sorted out approaches of improvised communication between Requirement Engineering (RE) and SCS in Safety Engineering. We have analyzed activities and techniques that should be performed by RE during safety analysis. Moreover, specified tools are explored that are used for analysis. We have focuses on systematic literature review for SCS where main focus is on mandatory safety concerns. Schemes are analyzed as per research questions to identify that which schemes consider these questions in three conditions including satisfactory, partial or not handled. We have selected a large number of articles from different publishers and then identified the articles with duplicate features. Finally we have selected a set of articles after eliminating duplicate ones and then evaluated these schemes as per research questions. We have concluded that requirement completeness, strong need for standard safety analysis tool and compliance with safety standards are mandatory to meet safety requirements during RE process.","PeriodicalId":259805,"journal":{"name":"2018 12th International Conference on Mathematics, Actuarial Science, Computer Science and Statistics (MACS)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 12th International Conference on Mathematics, Actuarial Science, Computer Science and Statistics (MACS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MACS.2018.8628389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Safety Critical Systems (SCS) are critical in organizing requirements and that's why needs appropriate requirement engineering. Requirements that are not completely understood and defined are the primary cause for safety related problems. In order to accomplish the task of eliminating chances of mismanaged requirement engineering. We have sorted out approaches of improvised communication between Requirement Engineering (RE) and SCS in Safety Engineering. We have analyzed activities and techniques that should be performed by RE during safety analysis. Moreover, specified tools are explored that are used for analysis. We have focuses on systematic literature review for SCS where main focus is on mandatory safety concerns. Schemes are analyzed as per research questions to identify that which schemes consider these questions in three conditions including satisfactory, partial or not handled. We have selected a large number of articles from different publishers and then identified the articles with duplicate features. Finally we have selected a set of articles after eliminating duplicate ones and then evaluated these schemes as per research questions. We have concluded that requirement completeness, strong need for standard safety analysis tool and compliance with safety standards are mandatory to meet safety requirements during RE process.
安全关键系统需求管理技术综述
安全关键系统(SCS)在组织需求方面至关重要,这就是为什么需要适当的需求工程。未完全理解和定义的要求是安全相关问题的主要原因。为了完成消除需求工程管理不善的机会的任务。我们整理了安全工程中需求工程与SCS之间的临时沟通方法。我们分析了在安全分析中应该由RE执行的活动和技术。此外,还探讨了用于分析的特定工具。我们对SCS进行了系统的文献综述,主要关注强制性安全问题。根据研究问题对方案进行分析,以确定哪些方案在满意、部分或未处理三种情况下考虑这些问题。我们选择了大量来自不同出版商的文章,然后识别出具有重复特征的文章。最后我们在剔除重复的文章后选择了一组文章,然后根据研究问题对这些方案进行评估。我们的结论是,满足RE过程的安全要求必须满足需求完备性、对标准安全分析工具的强烈需求和符合安全标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信