Akseptabilitas Draf Kriteria Baru Penentuan Kalender Hijriah Menurut Ahli Falak di Indonesia

Ahmad Fadholi
{"title":"Akseptabilitas Draf Kriteria Baru Penentuan Kalender Hijriah Menurut Ahli Falak di Indonesia","authors":"Ahmad Fadholi","doi":"10.32923/edugama.v5i1.961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015 AD, 2016 AD, 2017 and 2017 there was a new discussion about the draft of new criteria for the determination of the Islamic calendar in Indonesia, namely the draft MUI criteria and the new draft criteria MABIMS, with the criteria of 3 degrees hilal height and 6.4 degree elongation. This criterion is deliberately made for the benefit and mutual agreement for the unification of the hijri calendar in Indonesia. It is hoped that the experts of the Islamic organizations in Indonesia will give their views and attitudes to the draft of new criteria to harmonize the criteria for \"hilal visibility\" which will be used as a reference and guideline for the determination of the beginning of the Islamic month. This study shows that both the rukyat school and the reckoning school as a whole are acceptable for the draft MUI criteria and the new draft MABIMS as the determination of the Islamic calendar in Indonesia. However, overall the distribution of the scores of the two schools is categorized as moderate, so there are those who agree, disagree, and do not agree with the draft criteria. Overall, the two new draft criteria have the opportunity to be applied in Indonesia. To realize this, it is necessary to have a dialogue between Islamic mass organizations, astronomers and fiqh experts, as well as the government as policy makers.","PeriodicalId":308631,"journal":{"name":"Edugama: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Sosial Keagamaan","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edugama: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32923/edugama.v5i1.961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2015 AD, 2016 AD, 2017 and 2017 there was a new discussion about the draft of new criteria for the determination of the Islamic calendar in Indonesia, namely the draft MUI criteria and the new draft criteria MABIMS, with the criteria of 3 degrees hilal height and 6.4 degree elongation. This criterion is deliberately made for the benefit and mutual agreement for the unification of the hijri calendar in Indonesia. It is hoped that the experts of the Islamic organizations in Indonesia will give their views and attitudes to the draft of new criteria to harmonize the criteria for "hilal visibility" which will be used as a reference and guideline for the determination of the beginning of the Islamic month. This study shows that both the rukyat school and the reckoning school as a whole are acceptable for the draft MUI criteria and the new draft MABIMS as the determination of the Islamic calendar in Indonesia. However, overall the distribution of the scores of the two schools is categorized as moderate, so there are those who agree, disagree, and do not agree with the draft criteria. Overall, the two new draft criteria have the opportunity to be applied in Indonesia. To realize this, it is necessary to have a dialogue between Islamic mass organizations, astronomers and fiqh experts, as well as the government as policy makers.
根据印度尼西亚法拉克专家的说法,伊斯兰教日历的新标准的采用
在公元2015年、2016年、2017年和2017年,印度尼西亚对确定伊斯兰历法的新标准草案进行了新的讨论,即MUI标准草案和MABIMS新标准草案,标准为3度门高和6.4度延伸。这一标准是为了在印度尼西亚统一伊斯兰教历的利益和相互协议而故意制定的。希望印度尼西亚境内的伊斯兰组织的专家对新标准草案提出意见和态度,以协调“伊斯兰可见性”的标准,该标准将被用作确定伊斯兰月开始的参考和准则。本研究表明,rukyat学派和推算学派作为一个整体都可以接受MUI标准草案和新的MABIMS草案作为印度尼西亚伊斯兰历法的确定。但是,两所大学的分数分布总体上被划分为“中等”,因此,对标准草案有同意、不同意、不同意的意见。总的来说,这两项新的标准草案有机会在印度尼西亚适用。为了实现这一点,有必要在伊斯兰群众组织、天文学家和伊斯兰教专家以及作为政策制定者的政府之间进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信