Journalists in Parliaments. Three cases concerning the accessibility of legislatures in Central Europe

Péter Smuk
{"title":"Journalists in Parliaments. Three cases concerning the accessibility of legislatures in Central Europe","authors":"Péter Smuk","doi":"10.25142/cep.2017.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern legislatures, the public nature of political debates has been achieved as a constitutional principle. Constitutions and parliamentary standing orders provide with possibilities for journalists and media to access to sittings of the legislatures in order to offer the public the information on issues debated in parliament. Against this normative background, this paper introduces three cases (from Macedonia, Poland and Hungary) where journalists’ work have been limited in legislatures for several reasons. The paper considers also the competing values of freedom of information, freedom of expression visa-vis the dignity and undisturbed functioning of parliaments.","PeriodicalId":168251,"journal":{"name":"Central European Papers","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25142/cep.2017.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In modern legislatures, the public nature of political debates has been achieved as a constitutional principle. Constitutions and parliamentary standing orders provide with possibilities for journalists and media to access to sittings of the legislatures in order to offer the public the information on issues debated in parliament. Against this normative background, this paper introduces three cases (from Macedonia, Poland and Hungary) where journalists’ work have been limited in legislatures for several reasons. The paper considers also the competing values of freedom of information, freedom of expression visa-vis the dignity and undisturbed functioning of parliaments.
议会中的记者。三个关于中欧立法机构无障碍的案例
在现代立法机构中,政治辩论的公共性已经成为一项宪法原则。《宪法》和议会议事令为记者和媒体提供了进入立法机构会议的机会,以便向公众提供有关议会辩论问题的信息。在这种规范背景下,本文介绍了三个案例(来自马其顿、波兰和匈牙利),在这些案例中,由于种种原因,记者的工作在立法机关受到限制。本文还考虑了信息自由、言论自由与议会的尊严和不受干扰的运作之间的竞争价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信