New Customer Satisfaction Index for the Japanese Market: From Net Promoter Score to Promoter Score Japan

Tatsuya Kimura
{"title":"New Customer Satisfaction Index for the Japanese Market: From Net Promoter Score to Promoter Score Japan","authors":"Tatsuya Kimura","doi":"10.35609/jmmr.2022.7.3(5)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective - This paper aims to examine the applicability of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) to Japanese consumers. The NPS measures the relationship between customer loyalty and corporate growth as an alternative to the conventional customer satisfaction index because of its simplicity and ease of understanding for managers. However, because of its simplicity, the NPS has been criticized for not considering the culture and consumer characteristics of the various countries in which it is used. In this study, we review Japanese consumers' response styles and examine a more adaptable measurement scale to the Japanese market.\nMethodology/Technique - The sales data and customer NPS ratings of four companies in four industries—a cosmetics brand, a fashion e-commerce company, a daily necessities manufacturer, and a credit card company—were collected, and the relationship between them was analyzed to examine the validity of NPS classifications for the Japanese market.\nFindings –The study yielded the following results. (1) Customers who give the highest ratings tend to exert a more positive impact on corporate earnings through sales (spending amount). (2) Median spending amount intersects with the recommendation score at around 6. (3) On an ordinal scale from 0 to 10, the recommendation frequency significantly increases at 5. Moreover, this study reveals that the NPS classification of consumers is inconsistent with Japanese customers' actual situation.\nNovelty - As an alternative to the Net Promoter Score (NPS), the Promoter Score Japan (PSJ) is proposed to measure customer satisfaction and produce more accurate recommendations in the Japanese market.\nType of Paper: Empirical\nJEL Classification: M31, M39.\nKeywords: Net Promoter Score; customer satisfaction; customer recommendation; response bias; net promoter ratio; extreme response style; midpoint response style \nReference to this paper should be made as follows: Kimura, T. (2022). New Customer Satisfaction Index for the Japanese Market: From Net Promoter Score to Promoter Score Japan, J. Mgt. Mkt. Review, 7(3), 129 – 137. https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2022.7.3(5)","PeriodicalId":263628,"journal":{"name":"GATR Journal of Management and Marketing Review (GATR JMMR) VOL. 7 (3) JULY - SEPTEMBER 2022","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GATR Journal of Management and Marketing Review (GATR JMMR) VOL. 7 (3) JULY - SEPTEMBER 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2022.7.3(5)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective - This paper aims to examine the applicability of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) to Japanese consumers. The NPS measures the relationship between customer loyalty and corporate growth as an alternative to the conventional customer satisfaction index because of its simplicity and ease of understanding for managers. However, because of its simplicity, the NPS has been criticized for not considering the culture and consumer characteristics of the various countries in which it is used. In this study, we review Japanese consumers' response styles and examine a more adaptable measurement scale to the Japanese market. Methodology/Technique - The sales data and customer NPS ratings of four companies in four industries—a cosmetics brand, a fashion e-commerce company, a daily necessities manufacturer, and a credit card company—were collected, and the relationship between them was analyzed to examine the validity of NPS classifications for the Japanese market. Findings –The study yielded the following results. (1) Customers who give the highest ratings tend to exert a more positive impact on corporate earnings through sales (spending amount). (2) Median spending amount intersects with the recommendation score at around 6. (3) On an ordinal scale from 0 to 10, the recommendation frequency significantly increases at 5. Moreover, this study reveals that the NPS classification of consumers is inconsistent with Japanese customers' actual situation. Novelty - As an alternative to the Net Promoter Score (NPS), the Promoter Score Japan (PSJ) is proposed to measure customer satisfaction and produce more accurate recommendations in the Japanese market. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: M31, M39. Keywords: Net Promoter Score; customer satisfaction; customer recommendation; response bias; net promoter ratio; extreme response style; midpoint response style Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Kimura, T. (2022). New Customer Satisfaction Index for the Japanese Market: From Net Promoter Score to Promoter Score Japan, J. Mgt. Mkt. Review, 7(3), 129 – 137. https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2022.7.3(5)
日本市场的新客户满意度指数:从净推荐值到推荐值日本
目的:本文旨在研究净推荐值(NPS)对日本消费者的适用性。NPS衡量客户忠诚度与企业成长之间的关系,作为传统客户满意度指数的替代方案,因为它简单易懂,易于管理人员理解。但是,国民年金制度由于过于简单,没有考虑到使用国民年金制度的各国的文化和消费者特点,因此受到了批评。在这项研究中,我们回顾了日本消费者的反应风格,并研究了一个更适合日本市场的测量量表。△方法/技巧:收集化妆品、服装电子商务、日用品、信用卡公司等4个行业的4家企业的销售数据和顾客的国民年金评分,分析它们之间的关系,以检验国民年金分类在日本市场的有效性。研究结果-研究得出了以下结果。(1)评分最高的客户往往通过销售额(支出金额)对企业收益产生更积极的影响。(2)消费金额中位数与推荐评分在6分左右相交。(3)在0 - 10的序数尺度上,推荐频率在5处显著增加。此外,本研究还发现消费者的NPS分类与日本消费者的实际情况不一致。新颖性——作为净推荐值(NPS)的替代方案,日本推荐值(PSJ)被提出用于衡量客户满意度,并在日本市场产生更准确的推荐。论文类型:EmpiricalJEL分类:M31, M39。关键词:净推荐值;客户满意度;客户推荐;反应偏差;净启动比;极端反应型;参考本文内容如下:Kimura, T.(2022)。日本市场的新顾客满意度指数:从净推荐值到推荐值。Mkt。评论,7(3),129 - 137。https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2022.7.3 (5)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信