Female Circumcision and Sexual Satisfaction among Iranian Kurdish Women

Mahsa Abdollahzadeh, Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh, Niloufar Sattarzadeh Jahdi
{"title":"Female Circumcision and Sexual Satisfaction among Iranian Kurdish Women","authors":"Mahsa Abdollahzadeh, Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh, Niloufar Sattarzadeh Jahdi","doi":"10.2174/1573404818666220321144653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThere is contradictory evidence about the relationship between female circumcision and sexual function and satisfaction, which may be rooted in the cultural and social beliefs and the different types of genital mutilation/circumcision (GM/C).\n\n\n\nThe present study aimed to compare the sexual satisfaction among Iranian Kurdish women with and without GM/C.\n\n\n\nThis cross-sectional study was conducted on 310 women with and without GM/C aged 18-45 years, referred to the health centers of Mahabad, Iran, in 2020 using the convenience sampling method. After completing the informed consent form by the participants, the demographic and obstetric characteristics and Larson sexual satisfaction questionnaires were completed. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS21 software and Chi-square and ANCOVA tests were used.\n\n\n\nThe mean (SD) score of sexual satisfaction was 87.10 (6.15) and 86.99 (4.44) among women with and without GM/C, respectively. After controlling the effect of confounding variables, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. The majority of women in both groups (91.6% in women with type I of genital mutilation and 92.9% in women without GM/C) had moderate sexual satisfaction and there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of sexual satisfaction’s levels.\n\n\n\nThe results indicated no correlation between the sexual satisfaction and type I of female genital mutilation, which may be due to the limited area of genital injury, and the individual and social acceptance of this practice. A similar study design in other populations with different types of female genital mutilation is recommended.\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404818666220321144653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is contradictory evidence about the relationship between female circumcision and sexual function and satisfaction, which may be rooted in the cultural and social beliefs and the different types of genital mutilation/circumcision (GM/C). The present study aimed to compare the sexual satisfaction among Iranian Kurdish women with and without GM/C. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 310 women with and without GM/C aged 18-45 years, referred to the health centers of Mahabad, Iran, in 2020 using the convenience sampling method. After completing the informed consent form by the participants, the demographic and obstetric characteristics and Larson sexual satisfaction questionnaires were completed. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS21 software and Chi-square and ANCOVA tests were used. The mean (SD) score of sexual satisfaction was 87.10 (6.15) and 86.99 (4.44) among women with and without GM/C, respectively. After controlling the effect of confounding variables, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. The majority of women in both groups (91.6% in women with type I of genital mutilation and 92.9% in women without GM/C) had moderate sexual satisfaction and there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of sexual satisfaction’s levels. The results indicated no correlation between the sexual satisfaction and type I of female genital mutilation, which may be due to the limited area of genital injury, and the individual and social acceptance of this practice. A similar study design in other populations with different types of female genital mutilation is recommended.
伊朗库尔德女性的割礼和性满足
关于女性割礼与性功能和性满足之间的关系存在矛盾的证据,这可能源于文化和社会信仰以及不同类型的生殖器切割/割礼(GM/C)。本研究旨在比较有无GM/C的伊朗库尔德妇女的性满意度。本横断面研究采用便利抽样方法,于2020年对伊朗马哈巴德卫生中心的310名患有和未患有GM/C的18-45岁妇女进行了研究。参与者填写知情同意书后,完成人口统计学、产科特征和Larson性满意度问卷。收集的资料采用SPSS21软件进行分析,采用卡方检验和ANCOVA检验。有GM/C和无GM/C女性的性满意度均值(SD)分别为87.10(6.15)和86.99(4.44)分。在控制混杂变量的影响后,两组间无显著差异。两组中大多数女性(ⅰ型残割女性91.6%,未残割女性92.9%)的性满意度为中等,两组之间的性满意度水平无显著差异。结果表明,性满意度与女性生殖器切割类型之间没有相关性,这可能是由于生殖器损伤区域有限,以及个人和社会对这种做法的接受程度。建议在其他有不同类型女性生殖器切割的人群中进行类似的研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信