Comparative Analysis of the Blowfish Algorithm and the Des Algorithm in the Document File Encryption and Decryption Process

Ronaldo Praja Saputra, Jusuf Wahyudi, Juju Jumadi
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Blowfish Algorithm and the Des Algorithm in the Document File Encryption and Decryption Process","authors":"Ronaldo Praja Saputra, Jusuf Wahyudi, Juju Jumadi","doi":"10.53697/jkomitek.v2i2.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security issues are one of the most important aspects in the world of information technology, such as document security. Most of the documents are created through the Microsoft Office application package, because it is easy to use. There are several applications available in Microsoft Office, namely Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Access, Microsoft Powerpoint, and others that are used to process words and numbers according to user needs. Comparative analysis of the Blowfish algorithm and the DES algorithm in the encryption process is carried out based on 3 comparison aspects, namely processing time, file size and memory used. Comparisons were made with 40 test data in the form of document files, each consisting of 10 test data with extension formats *.docx, *.xlsx, *.pdf, and *.pptx, where these formats are familiar in data processing using Microsoft Office. Based on the tests that have been carried out, it can be concluded that in the encryption process, the DES Algorithm has a faster time than the Blowfish Algorithm with a percentage of the DES Algorithm's encryption processing time of 3.7975%. In the decryption process, the DES Algorithm has a faster time compared to the Blowfish Algorithm with a percentage of the DES Algorithm's encryption processing time of 3.595%. In the encryption process, the file size in the DES Algorithm increases bytes less than the file size in the Blowfish Algorithm. In the decryption process, the file size in the DES Algorithm and the Blowfish Algorithm does not change, because the file size returns to the original file size. In the encryption process, the DES Algorithm uses less memory compared to the Blowfish Algorithm with the percentage of memory used by the DES Algorithm being 49.655%. In the decryption process, the Blowfish Algorithm uses less memory compared to the DES Algorithm with the percentage of memory used by the Blowfish Algorithm 49.5925%","PeriodicalId":371693,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Komputer, Informasi dan Teknologi (JKOMITEK)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Komputer, Informasi dan Teknologi (JKOMITEK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53697/jkomitek.v2i2.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Security issues are one of the most important aspects in the world of information technology, such as document security. Most of the documents are created through the Microsoft Office application package, because it is easy to use. There are several applications available in Microsoft Office, namely Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Access, Microsoft Powerpoint, and others that are used to process words and numbers according to user needs. Comparative analysis of the Blowfish algorithm and the DES algorithm in the encryption process is carried out based on 3 comparison aspects, namely processing time, file size and memory used. Comparisons were made with 40 test data in the form of document files, each consisting of 10 test data with extension formats *.docx, *.xlsx, *.pdf, and *.pptx, where these formats are familiar in data processing using Microsoft Office. Based on the tests that have been carried out, it can be concluded that in the encryption process, the DES Algorithm has a faster time than the Blowfish Algorithm with a percentage of the DES Algorithm's encryption processing time of 3.7975%. In the decryption process, the DES Algorithm has a faster time compared to the Blowfish Algorithm with a percentage of the DES Algorithm's encryption processing time of 3.595%. In the encryption process, the file size in the DES Algorithm increases bytes less than the file size in the Blowfish Algorithm. In the decryption process, the file size in the DES Algorithm and the Blowfish Algorithm does not change, because the file size returns to the original file size. In the encryption process, the DES Algorithm uses less memory compared to the Blowfish Algorithm with the percentage of memory used by the DES Algorithm being 49.655%. In the decryption process, the Blowfish Algorithm uses less memory compared to the DES Algorithm with the percentage of memory used by the Blowfish Algorithm 49.5925%
文档文件加解密过程中Blowfish算法与Des算法的比较分析
安全问题是信息技术世界中最重要的方面之一,例如文档安全。大多数文档都是通过Microsoft Office应用程序包创建的,因为它易于使用。Microsoft Office中有几种应用程序,即Microsoft Word、Microsoft Excel、Microsoft Access、Microsoft Powerpoint等,用于根据用户需要处理文字和数字。从处理时间、文件大小和使用的内存3个方面对Blowfish算法和DES算法在加密过程中进行比较分析。对比40个文档文件形式的测试数据,每个文档文件由10个扩展格式为*.docx、*.xlsx、*.pdf和*.pptx的测试数据组成,这些格式在Microsoft Office数据处理中比较常见。根据已经进行的测试可以得出结论,在加密过程中,DES算法比Blowfish算法更快,其加密处理时间占DES算法加密处理时间的百分比为3.7975%。在解密过程中,DES算法比Blowfish算法的速度更快,其加密处理时间占DES算法的3.595%。在加密过程中,DES算法的文件大小增量比Blowfish算法的文件大小增量小。在解密过程中,DES算法和Blowfish算法中的文件大小不会改变,因为文件大小会恢复到原来的文件大小。在加密过程中,DES算法比Blowfish算法占用更少的内存,DES算法占用内存的比例为49.655%。在解密过程中,河豚算法使用的内存比DES算法少,河豚算法使用的内存占比为49.5925%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信