An Analysis of Curriculum 2013 English Textbook at Seventh Grade Students of Junior High School

Medi Adioska
{"title":"An Analysis of Curriculum 2013 English Textbook at Seventh Grade Students of Junior High School","authors":"Medi Adioska","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200306.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"m.adioska@gmail.com Abstract Indonesia has just implemented a new curriculum called the 2013 Curriculum. The new curriculum brought a new textbook. This study aimed to determine to what extent did the 2013 English textbook curriculum meets the criteria of a good book in the form of Psychological Validity, Pedagogical Validity, and Process and Content Validity. This research used a descriptive method. The findings were taken through a checklist and interview instrument. Researcher filled in the checklist then conducted interviewed with the English regarding the use of the textbook. The results showed that Psychological Validity only fulfilled 54.76%, Pedagogical Validity was 52.78% and Process and Content Validity was 65.63%. Based on the research conducted, it can be concluded that the curriculum 2013 English textbook had not all met the criteria of a good book. Therefore, it was recommended that the Education Ministry and all stakeholders in the field of education should review the material and presentation methods in this book. For English teachers, it is recommended to improve their creativity and teaching abilities, prepare other resources for studying this book. For further researchers, it was hoped that they will be able to conduct research with a more in depth","PeriodicalId":254220,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2019)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

m.adioska@gmail.com Abstract Indonesia has just implemented a new curriculum called the 2013 Curriculum. The new curriculum brought a new textbook. This study aimed to determine to what extent did the 2013 English textbook curriculum meets the criteria of a good book in the form of Psychological Validity, Pedagogical Validity, and Process and Content Validity. This research used a descriptive method. The findings were taken through a checklist and interview instrument. Researcher filled in the checklist then conducted interviewed with the English regarding the use of the textbook. The results showed that Psychological Validity only fulfilled 54.76%, Pedagogical Validity was 52.78% and Process and Content Validity was 65.63%. Based on the research conducted, it can be concluded that the curriculum 2013 English textbook had not all met the criteria of a good book. Therefore, it was recommended that the Education Ministry and all stakeholders in the field of education should review the material and presentation methods in this book. For English teachers, it is recommended to improve their creativity and teaching abilities, prepare other resources for studying this book. For further researchers, it was hoped that they will be able to conduct research with a more in depth
2013年初中七年级英语课程教材分析
m.adioska@gmail.com摘要印度尼西亚刚刚实施了一项名为2013年课程的新课程。新课程带来了新教科书。本研究旨在以心理效度、教学效度、过程效度和内容效度的形式确定2013年英语教科书课程在多大程度上符合好书的标准。本研究采用描述性方法。调查结果是通过检查表和访谈工具得出的。研究人员填写了检查表,然后就教科书的使用情况与英语进行了访谈。结果表明,心理效度仅为54.76%,教学效度为52.78%,过程效度和内容效度为65.63%。根据所进行的研究,可以得出结论,2013年课程英语教科书并没有完全达到一本好书的标准。因此,建议教育部和教育领域的所有利益相关者都应该审查这本书的材料和表达方法。对于英语教师,建议提高自己的创造力和教学能力,准备其他资源来学习这本书。对于进一步的研究人员,希望他们能够进行更深入的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信