Phases of fossil fuel decline: Diagnostic framework for policy sequencing and feasible transition pathways in resource dependent regions

IF 3.4
Lola Nacke, A. Cherp, J. Jewell
{"title":"Phases of fossil fuel decline: Diagnostic framework for policy sequencing and feasible transition pathways in resource dependent regions","authors":"Lola Nacke, A. Cherp, J. Jewell","doi":"10.1093/ooenergy/oiac002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Phasing out fossil fuels requires destabilizing incumbent regimes while protecting vulnerable groups negatively affected by fossil fuel decline. We argue that sequencing destabilization and just transition policies addresses three policy problems: phasing out fossil fuels, transforming affected industries, and ensuring socio-economic recovery in fossil resource-dependent regions. We identify the key mechanisms shaping the evolution of the three systems associated with these policy problems: (1) transformations of technological systems addressed by the socio-technical transitions literature; (2) responses of firms and industries addressed by the management and business literature; and (3) regional strategies for socio-economic recovery addressed by the regional geography and economics literatures. We then draw on Elinor Ostrom’s approach to synthesize these different bodies of knowledge into a diagnostic tool which enables scholars to identify the phase of decline for each system, across which the nature and importance of different risks to sustained fossil fuel decline varies. The main risk in the first phase is lock-in or persistence of status quo. In the second phase, the main risk is backlash from directly affected companies and workers. In the third phase the main risk is regional despondence. We illustrate our diagnostic tool with three empirical cases of phases of coal decline: South Africa (phase 1), the United States (phase 2), and the Netherlands (phase 3). Our review contributes to developing effective policy sequences for phasing out fossil fuels.","PeriodicalId":423241,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Open Energy","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Open Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ooenergy/oiac002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Phasing out fossil fuels requires destabilizing incumbent regimes while protecting vulnerable groups negatively affected by fossil fuel decline. We argue that sequencing destabilization and just transition policies addresses three policy problems: phasing out fossil fuels, transforming affected industries, and ensuring socio-economic recovery in fossil resource-dependent regions. We identify the key mechanisms shaping the evolution of the three systems associated with these policy problems: (1) transformations of technological systems addressed by the socio-technical transitions literature; (2) responses of firms and industries addressed by the management and business literature; and (3) regional strategies for socio-economic recovery addressed by the regional geography and economics literatures. We then draw on Elinor Ostrom’s approach to synthesize these different bodies of knowledge into a diagnostic tool which enables scholars to identify the phase of decline for each system, across which the nature and importance of different risks to sustained fossil fuel decline varies. The main risk in the first phase is lock-in or persistence of status quo. In the second phase, the main risk is backlash from directly affected companies and workers. In the third phase the main risk is regional despondence. We illustrate our diagnostic tool with three empirical cases of phases of coal decline: South Africa (phase 1), the United States (phase 2), and the Netherlands (phase 3). Our review contributes to developing effective policy sequences for phasing out fossil fuels.
化石燃料减少的阶段:资源依赖地区政策排序和可行过渡途径的诊断框架
逐步淘汰化石燃料需要动摇现任政权,同时保护受化石燃料减少负面影响的弱势群体。我们认为,排序不稳定和公正转型政策解决了三个政策问题:逐步淘汰化石燃料,转变受影响的行业,并确保化石资源依赖地区的社会经济复苏。我们确定了形成与这些政策问题相关的三个系统演变的关键机制:(1)社会技术转型文献所解决的技术系统转型;(2)管理和商业文献所涉及的企业和行业的反应;(3)区域地理学和经济学文献探讨的区域社会经济复苏战略。然后,我们借鉴埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆的方法,将这些不同的知识体系综合成一个诊断工具,使学者们能够确定每个系统的衰退阶段,在这个阶段,化石燃料持续衰退的不同风险的性质和重要性各不相同。第一阶段的主要风险是固步自封或维持现状。在第二阶段,主要风险是直接受影响的公司和工人的反弹。在第三阶段,主要的风险是地区性的沮丧。我们用三个煤炭减少阶段的经验案例来说明我们的诊断工具:南非(第一阶段)、美国(第二阶段)和荷兰(第三阶段)。我们的回顾有助于制定有效的逐步淘汰化石燃料的政策序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书