{"title":"Comparison of switch controlling alternatives","authors":"V. Skorpil, P. Cika, L. Mojzis","doi":"10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Besides the other parts, advanced communication networks also contain switches. These networks and these switches must guarantee Quality of Service (QoS) and a comparison of switch controlling alternatives is the main aim of this paper. Two alternatives applicable for switch controlling — classical method and using of neural network for this purpose are designed and simulated. Both models are simulated by MATLAB-SIMULINK environment for four differential QoS demands, a web server, an Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) server, a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) user and a printer. A comparison of Switch Controlling alternatives shows that controlling by neural network is faster than classic method and using of neural networks for this purpose is more useful.","PeriodicalId":387984,"journal":{"name":"2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIERS.2017.8261846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Besides the other parts, advanced communication networks also contain switches. These networks and these switches must guarantee Quality of Service (QoS) and a comparison of switch controlling alternatives is the main aim of this paper. Two alternatives applicable for switch controlling — classical method and using of neural network for this purpose are designed and simulated. Both models are simulated by MATLAB-SIMULINK environment for four differential QoS demands, a web server, an Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) server, a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) user and a printer. A comparison of Switch Controlling alternatives shows that controlling by neural network is faster than classic method and using of neural networks for this purpose is more useful.
除了其他部分,高级通信网络还包含交换机。这些网络和交换机必须保证服务质量(QoS),对交换机控制方案进行比较是本文的主要目的。设计并仿真了两种适用于开关控制的方法——经典控制方法和神经网络控制方法。在MATLAB-SIMULINK环境下,分别对web服务器、IPTV (Internet Protocol Television)服务器、VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol)用户和打印机四种不同的QoS需求进行了仿真。通过对几种切换控制方法的比较,表明神经网络控制比经典方法控制速度快,神经网络控制更有效。