{"title":"Survival of Glass Ionomer Restorations in Primary Molar Teeth in a Tertiary Hospital in Chitwan","authors":"S. Adhikari, L. Tamrakar, R. Bhattarai, V. Thapa","doi":"10.3126/jnprossoc.v5i2.55736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is frequently used as a restorative material in dentistry and has been known for its anti-carious property, biocompatibility and good marginal adaptation. The study aims to evaluate the survival of GIC restorations on primary molar teeth of dental patients attending College of Medical Sciences, Chitwan.\nMethods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted among the patients who were treated with, at least one GIC restoration (GC Fuji II/GC Fuji IX GP) in their primary molars during the past three years. Data were collected to assess the demographic variables like gender, economic status and mother’s education; restoration-related variables like no of surfaces involved, type of material used, location of the restoration in oral cavity, and age of restoration and; outcome related variable i.e. survival of restoration (survived / failed). United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria was used to determine survival. Data analysis was done using software SPSS version 17. Chi-square tests were carried out to find out the association between dependent and independent variables. Significance level was set at p<0.05.\nResults: The 1-3 years cumulative survival rate of the GIC restoration in primary molars was found to be 74.5%. The survival rates for 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were found to be 93.5%, 78.6% and 62.5% respectively. There was no significant association between the survival of the restoration and location of the tooth in oral cavity and sociodemographic indicators like gender, age, economic status and mother’s education. However, statistically significant association was found between survival of restoration and type of restorative material, number of surfaces involved and age of restoration. Type VIII GIC had a higher survival rate (85.7%) compared to Type II GIC (68.2%), and single-surface restorations had a higher survival rate (84.9%) compared to two-surface restorations (52.3%).\nConclusion: Our findings suggest that GIC can be used for restoring primary molars, particularly as single-surface restorative material. It also suggests that Type VIII GIC can more effective in restoring the primary molars as compared to the conventional Type II GIC.","PeriodicalId":247304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnprossoc.v5i2.55736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is frequently used as a restorative material in dentistry and has been known for its anti-carious property, biocompatibility and good marginal adaptation. The study aims to evaluate the survival of GIC restorations on primary molar teeth of dental patients attending College of Medical Sciences, Chitwan.
Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted among the patients who were treated with, at least one GIC restoration (GC Fuji II/GC Fuji IX GP) in their primary molars during the past three years. Data were collected to assess the demographic variables like gender, economic status and mother’s education; restoration-related variables like no of surfaces involved, type of material used, location of the restoration in oral cavity, and age of restoration and; outcome related variable i.e. survival of restoration (survived / failed). United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria was used to determine survival. Data analysis was done using software SPSS version 17. Chi-square tests were carried out to find out the association between dependent and independent variables. Significance level was set at p<0.05.
Results: The 1-3 years cumulative survival rate of the GIC restoration in primary molars was found to be 74.5%. The survival rates for 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were found to be 93.5%, 78.6% and 62.5% respectively. There was no significant association between the survival of the restoration and location of the tooth in oral cavity and sociodemographic indicators like gender, age, economic status and mother’s education. However, statistically significant association was found between survival of restoration and type of restorative material, number of surfaces involved and age of restoration. Type VIII GIC had a higher survival rate (85.7%) compared to Type II GIC (68.2%), and single-surface restorations had a higher survival rate (84.9%) compared to two-surface restorations (52.3%).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that GIC can be used for restoring primary molars, particularly as single-surface restorative material. It also suggests that Type VIII GIC can more effective in restoring the primary molars as compared to the conventional Type II GIC.
简介:玻璃离子水门合剂(GIC)是一种常用的牙科修复材料,因其抗龋性、生物相容性和良好的边缘适应性而闻名。本研究旨在评估在Chitwan医学院就读的牙科患者的初级磨牙GIC修复体的存活率。方法:回顾性纵向研究在过去的三年中,在他们的第一磨牙上至少接受过一次GIC修复(GC Fuji II/GC Fuji IX GP)治疗的患者。收集数据以评估人口统计变量,如性别、经济状况和母亲的教育程度;与修复相关的变量,如不涉及表面,使用的材料类型,修复在口腔中的位置,修复的年龄和;结果相关变量,即修复存活(存活/失败)。使用美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准来确定生存率。数据分析采用SPSS version 17软件。进行卡方检验以找出因变量和自变量之间的关联。p<0.05为显著性水平。结果:1 ~ 3年的累积成活率为74.5%。1年、2年、3年生存率分别为93.5%、78.6%、62.5%。牙体修复成活率和牙体在口腔内的位置与性别、年龄、经济状况、母亲受教育程度等社会人口学指标无显著相关性。然而,修复体的存活率与修复材料的类型、涉及的表面数量和修复体的年龄之间存在统计学上的显著关联。VIII型GIC的存活率(85.7%)高于II型GIC(68.2%),单表面修复体的存活率(84.9%)高于双表面修复体(52.3%)。结论:GIC可作为单面修复材料用于初生磨牙的修复。这也表明,与传统的II型GIC相比,VIII型GIC在修复初级磨牙方面更有效。