The Challenges of Women Contribution in Policymaking and How They Overcome It: An Indonesian Study

Ani Purwanti, F. Setiawan
{"title":"The Challenges of Women Contribution in Policymaking and How They Overcome It: An Indonesian Study","authors":"Ani Purwanti, F. Setiawan","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.201017.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of the women's participation in the Indonesian parliament begins with its mainstreaming in participation policy. Affirmative action policies aimed at empowering women's representation in parliament are judged by the quantity of women's participation in parliament having a fundamental problem in the commitment to representation itself. Women's contributions to policymaking are often systematically undermined in a political culture that is maledominant and masculine-driven, thus hindering the progress for gender-mainstreaming policies. The aim and focus of this article are to analyze the roots of the stagnancy of women's contribution and progress in such an intricate political sphere that is Indonesian parliament and how women politicians tackle it. Through our study, we acknowledged that there is a dualreality of Indonesian politics that is a vote-based representative system of decision-making that is commonly employed in legislative bodies and the Indonesian culture that heavily emphasizes consensus-building decision making through deliberation. The crippling sexism behind the political practices of policymaking obstructs women legislators to contribute more significantly and be given credit to the legislative process through which they are fighting for","PeriodicalId":389639,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2020)","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201017.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of the women's participation in the Indonesian parliament begins with its mainstreaming in participation policy. Affirmative action policies aimed at empowering women's representation in parliament are judged by the quantity of women's participation in parliament having a fundamental problem in the commitment to representation itself. Women's contributions to policymaking are often systematically undermined in a political culture that is maledominant and masculine-driven, thus hindering the progress for gender-mainstreaming policies. The aim and focus of this article are to analyze the roots of the stagnancy of women's contribution and progress in such an intricate political sphere that is Indonesian parliament and how women politicians tackle it. Through our study, we acknowledged that there is a dualreality of Indonesian politics that is a vote-based representative system of decision-making that is commonly employed in legislative bodies and the Indonesian culture that heavily emphasizes consensus-building decision making through deliberation. The crippling sexism behind the political practices of policymaking obstructs women legislators to contribute more significantly and be given credit to the legislative process through which they are fighting for
妇女参与决策的挑战及她们如何克服:一项印度尼西亚研究
妇女参与印度尼西亚议会的问题始于其参与政策的主流化。旨在增强妇女在议会中的代表权的平权行动政策是根据妇女参加议会的数量来判断的,而妇女参加议会的数量本身就存在对代表权的承诺这一根本问题。在男性占主导地位和男性主导的政治文化中,妇女对决策的贡献往往被系统地破坏,从而阻碍了性别主流化政策的进展。本文的目的和重点是分析妇女在印度尼西亚议会这样一个错综复杂的政治领域的贡献和进步停滞不前的根源,以及妇女政治家如何解决这个问题。通过我们的研究,我们认识到印尼政治存在双重现实,即立法机构普遍采用的以投票为基础的决策代议制,以及高度强调通过审议达成共识的印尼文化。政策制定的政治实践背后严重的性别歧视阻碍了女性立法者做出更大的贡献,也阻碍了她们为之奋斗的立法进程得到认可
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信