The future of mental health services: the organising challenge ahead: This instalment of the Soundings Futures series grapples with the current crisis facing the UK’s mental health services

E. Cotton
{"title":"The future of mental health services: the organising challenge ahead: This instalment of the Soundings Futures series grapples with the current crisis facing the UK’s mental health services","authors":"E. Cotton","doi":"10.3898/SOUN.70.09.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We are still failing to protect our mental health services and the people who deliver them. One central reason for current problems is the overwhelming focus of the service on Increased Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), the NHS’s largest mental health programme. The ‘evidence base’ for this programme’s effectiveness has been established through the widespread use of performance data, drawn from a system that has itself become highly contested. IAPT is also a key component within the government’s austerity programme and its plans for the introduction of the new ‘fitness for work’ welfare assessment process. And it is also an enabler of the opening up of the mental health sector to outside providers, partly because it paves the way towards a downgrading of jobs. It also fits perfectly with a preoccupation with financial targets and performance indicators that reflect efficiency within the service rather than clinical outcomes. To begin to address all this, there is a need for a public inquiry into the current regime of performance management and the IAPT model, and the development of a new network that can create a platform for national engagement on the key issues.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.70.09.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:We are still failing to protect our mental health services and the people who deliver them. One central reason for current problems is the overwhelming focus of the service on Increased Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), the NHS’s largest mental health programme. The ‘evidence base’ for this programme’s effectiveness has been established through the widespread use of performance data, drawn from a system that has itself become highly contested. IAPT is also a key component within the government’s austerity programme and its plans for the introduction of the new ‘fitness for work’ welfare assessment process. And it is also an enabler of the opening up of the mental health sector to outside providers, partly because it paves the way towards a downgrading of jobs. It also fits perfectly with a preoccupation with financial targets and performance indicators that reflect efficiency within the service rather than clinical outcomes. To begin to address all this, there is a need for a public inquiry into the current regime of performance management and the IAPT model, and the development of a new network that can create a platform for national engagement on the key issues.
心理健康服务的未来:前方的组织挑战:“未来探测”系列的这一部分与当前英国心理健康服务面临的危机作斗争
摘要:我们仍然未能保护我们的精神卫生服务和提供这些服务的人员。当前问题的一个核心原因是,NHS最大的心理健康项目——“增加心理治疗机会”(IAPT)——过于关注该服务。该方案有效性的“证据基础”是通过广泛使用绩效数据建立起来的,这些数据来自一个本身已成为高度争议的系统。IAPT也是政府紧缩计划及其引入新的“适合工作”福利评估程序的计划的关键组成部分。此外,它还推动了精神卫生部门向外部提供者开放,部分原因是它为降低工作等级铺平了道路。它也完全符合对财务目标和绩效指标的关注,这些指标反映了服务的效率,而不是临床结果。为了开始解决所有这些问题,有必要对当前的绩效管理制度和IAPT模式进行公开调查,并开发一个新的网络,为国家参与关键问题创造一个平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信