Content delivery over TLS: a cryptographic analysis of keyless SSL

K. Bhargavan, Ioana Boureanu, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Cristina Onete, Benjamin Richard
{"title":"Content delivery over TLS: a cryptographic analysis of keyless SSL","authors":"K. Bhargavan, Ioana Boureanu, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Cristina Onete, Benjamin Richard","doi":"10.1109/EuroSP.2017.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol is designed to allow two parties, a client and a server, to communicate securely over an insecure network. However, when TLS connections are proxied through an intermediate middlebox, like a Content Delivery Network (CDN), the standard endto- end security guarantees of the protocol no longer apply. In this paper, we investigate the security guarantees provided by Keyless SSL, a CDN architecture currently deployed by CloudFlare that composes two TLS 1.2 handshakes to obtain a proxied TLS connection. We demonstrate new attacks that show that Keyless SSL does not meet its intended security goals. These attacks have been reported to CloudFlare and we are in the process of discussing fixes. We argue that proxied TLS handshakes require a new, stronger, 3-party security definition. We present 3(S)ACCEsecurity, a generalization of the 2-party ACCE security definition that has been used in several previous proofs for TLS. We modify Keyless SSL and prove that our modifications guarantee 3(S)ACCE-security, assuming ACCE-security for the individual TLS 1.2 connections. We also propose a new design for Keyless TLS 1.3 and prove that it achieves 3(S)ACCEsecurity, assuming that the TLS 1.3 handshake implements an authenticated 2-party key exchange. Notably, we show that secure proxying in Keyless TLS 1.3 is computationally lighter and requires simpler assumptions on the certificate infrastructure than our proposed fix for Keyless SSL. Our results indicate that proxied TLS architectures, as currently used by a number of CDNs, may be vulnerable to subtle attacks and deserve close attention.","PeriodicalId":233564,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2017.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol is designed to allow two parties, a client and a server, to communicate securely over an insecure network. However, when TLS connections are proxied through an intermediate middlebox, like a Content Delivery Network (CDN), the standard endto- end security guarantees of the protocol no longer apply. In this paper, we investigate the security guarantees provided by Keyless SSL, a CDN architecture currently deployed by CloudFlare that composes two TLS 1.2 handshakes to obtain a proxied TLS connection. We demonstrate new attacks that show that Keyless SSL does not meet its intended security goals. These attacks have been reported to CloudFlare and we are in the process of discussing fixes. We argue that proxied TLS handshakes require a new, stronger, 3-party security definition. We present 3(S)ACCEsecurity, a generalization of the 2-party ACCE security definition that has been used in several previous proofs for TLS. We modify Keyless SSL and prove that our modifications guarantee 3(S)ACCE-security, assuming ACCE-security for the individual TLS 1.2 connections. We also propose a new design for Keyless TLS 1.3 and prove that it achieves 3(S)ACCEsecurity, assuming that the TLS 1.3 handshake implements an authenticated 2-party key exchange. Notably, we show that secure proxying in Keyless TLS 1.3 is computationally lighter and requires simpler assumptions on the certificate infrastructure than our proposed fix for Keyless SSL. Our results indicate that proxied TLS architectures, as currently used by a number of CDNs, may be vulnerable to subtle attacks and deserve close attention.
基于TLS的内容交付:无密钥SSL的加密分析
传输层安全(TLS)协议旨在允许客户端和服务器双方在不安全的网络上进行安全通信。然而,当TLS连接通过一个中间代理,如内容分发网络(CDN)时,协议的标准端到端安全保证不再适用。在本文中,我们研究了无密钥SSL提供的安全保证,无密钥SSL是CloudFlare目前部署的一种CDN架构,它由两次TLS 1.2握手组成,以获得代理TLS连接。我们将演示新的攻击,这些攻击表明无密钥SSL不能满足其预期的安全目标。这些攻击已经报告给CloudFlare,我们正在讨论修复程序。我们认为代理TLS握手需要一个新的、更强的三方安全定义。我们提出了3(S)ACCEsecurity,这是在之前的几个TLS证明中使用的2方访问安全定义的概括。我们修改了无密钥SSL,并证明我们的修改保证了3(S)访问安全性,假设每个TLS 1.2连接都具有访问安全性。我们还提出了一种新的无密钥TLS 1.3设计,并证明了它实现了3(S)访问安全性,假设TLS 1.3握手实现了经过身份验证的双方密钥交换。值得注意的是,我们展示了无密钥TLS 1.3中的安全代理比我们提议的无密钥SSL修复方案在计算上更轻,对证书基础结构的假设也更简单。我们的研究结果表明,目前许多cdn使用的代理TLS架构可能容易受到微妙的攻击,值得密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信