Conclusion

Abstract

The Conclusion explores the gains of approaching Harrington from beyond the republican paradigm. In the first place, we see more clearly the complexity and atypicality of Harrington’s republicanism, and even the possibility of characterizing him as a democrat. Secondly, it is evident that Harrington was neither wholly ancient nor thoroughly modern, but cut a distinctive path between the two. Moreover, his pursuit of a middle way is also reflected in his insistence on post-Civil War reconciliation and in the character of his republicanism, his democracy, his religious views, and his underlying philosophical position. Finally, Harrington’s contributions to historical, religious, and philosophical thought can now be more fully appreciated, along with his innovations in the form and presentation of his works. These findings not only enhance our perspective on Harrington, but have wider implications for our understanding of the seventeenth century and the discipline of intellectual history.