An analysis of item response theory using program R

A. Ali, E. Istiyono
{"title":"An analysis of item response theory using program R","authors":"A. Ali, E. Istiyono","doi":"10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.11252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The test is one of the instruments used to assess the extent of student understanding in learning. Multiple choice is a type of test commonly used in testing students. In addition to testing students' understanding, the quality of the tests used also needs to be tested. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the national mathematics test items in Baubau in the 2015/2016 academic year and the test information function with the item response theory approach. This research is an ex-post-facto study with a sample size of 574 students using a random sampling technique. Data was collected through documentation and analyzed using the LTM R package program. Findings indicated that there were four items (I1, I2, I4, and I8) for the 1-PL model, six items (I1, I2, I4, I7, I8, and I10) for the 2-PL model, and seven items (I1, I2, I3, I4, I7, I9, and I10) (3-PL) that fit the model (FM). The percentage of good (G) item parameters using R was 90% for (b) (1-PL), 90% (b) and 100% (a) (2-PL), and 90% (b), 10% (a), and 70% (c) (3-PL). The percentage of good quality items in each model for the 1-PL model was 40% or four items, the 2-PL model was 60% or six items, and the 3-PL model was 0%, or none was included in the good quality item category.","PeriodicalId":385020,"journal":{"name":"Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.11252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The test is one of the instruments used to assess the extent of student understanding in learning. Multiple choice is a type of test commonly used in testing students. In addition to testing students' understanding, the quality of the tests used also needs to be tested. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the national mathematics test items in Baubau in the 2015/2016 academic year and the test information function with the item response theory approach. This research is an ex-post-facto study with a sample size of 574 students using a random sampling technique. Data was collected through documentation and analyzed using the LTM R package program. Findings indicated that there were four items (I1, I2, I4, and I8) for the 1-PL model, six items (I1, I2, I4, I7, I8, and I10) for the 2-PL model, and seven items (I1, I2, I3, I4, I7, I9, and I10) (3-PL) that fit the model (FM). The percentage of good (G) item parameters using R was 90% for (b) (1-PL), 90% (b) and 100% (a) (2-PL), and 90% (b), 10% (a), and 70% (c) (3-PL). The percentage of good quality items in each model for the 1-PL model was 40% or four items, the 2-PL model was 60% or six items, and the 3-PL model was 0%, or none was included in the good quality item category.
用R程序分析项目反应理论
该测试是用来评估学生在学习中的理解程度的工具之一。多项选择题是测试学生常用的一种测试。除了测试学生的理解力外,所使用的测试的质量也需要测试。本研究旨在运用项目反应理论的方法确定2015/2016学年包包市国家数学测试项目的特征及其测试信息功能。本研究采用随机抽样的方法,对574名学生进行了事后调查。通过文档收集数据,并使用LTM R软件包程序进行分析。结果表明,1-PL模型有4个条目(I1、I2、I4、I4和I8), 2-PL模型有6个条目(I1、I2、I4、I7、I8和I10), 3-PL模型有7个条目(I1、I2、I3、I4、I7、I9和I10)。(b) (1-PL)、(b) (2-PL)、(a) (b)和(a) (2-PL)中使用R的良好(G)项目参数的百分比为90%,(b)、(a)和(c) (3-PL)为90%、10%和70%。1-PL模型中每个模型中优质项目的百分比为40%或4个项目,2-PL模型为60%或6个项目,3-PL模型为0%,或没有包括在优质项目类别中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信