Why is the Euro Punching Below its Weight

E. Ilzetzki, Carmen M. Reinhart, Kenneth Rogoff
{"title":"Why is the Euro Punching Below its Weight","authors":"E. Ilzetzki, Carmen M. Reinhart, Kenneth Rogoff","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3604602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n On the twentieth anniversary of its inception, the euro has yet to expand its role as an international currency. We document this fact with a wide range of indicators including its role as an anchor or reference in exchange rate arrangements – which we argue is a portmanteau measure – and as a currency for the denomination of trade and assets. On all these dimensions, the euro comprises a far smaller share than that of the US dollar. Furthermore, that share has been roughly constant since 1999. By some measures, the euro plays no larger role than the Deutschemark and French franc that it replaced. We explore the reasons for this underperformance. While the leading anchor currency may have a natural monopoly, a number of additional factors have limited the euro’s reach, including lack of financial centre, limited geopolitical reach and US and Chinese dominance in technology research. Most important, in our view, is the comparatively scarce supply of (safe) euro-denominated assets, which we document. The European Central Bank’s (ECB's) lack of policy clarity may have also played a role. We show that the euro era can be divided into a ‘Bundesbank-plus’ period and a ‘Whatever it Takes’ period. The first shows a smooth transition from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism and continued to stabilize German inflation. The second period is characterized by an expanding ECB arsenal of credit facilities to European banks and sovereigns.","PeriodicalId":438941,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: International Macroeconomics & Finance (Topic)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: International Macroeconomics & Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3604602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

On the twentieth anniversary of its inception, the euro has yet to expand its role as an international currency. We document this fact with a wide range of indicators including its role as an anchor or reference in exchange rate arrangements – which we argue is a portmanteau measure – and as a currency for the denomination of trade and assets. On all these dimensions, the euro comprises a far smaller share than that of the US dollar. Furthermore, that share has been roughly constant since 1999. By some measures, the euro plays no larger role than the Deutschemark and French franc that it replaced. We explore the reasons for this underperformance. While the leading anchor currency may have a natural monopoly, a number of additional factors have limited the euro’s reach, including lack of financial centre, limited geopolitical reach and US and Chinese dominance in technology research. Most important, in our view, is the comparatively scarce supply of (safe) euro-denominated assets, which we document. The European Central Bank’s (ECB's) lack of policy clarity may have also played a role. We show that the euro era can be divided into a ‘Bundesbank-plus’ period and a ‘Whatever it Takes’ period. The first shows a smooth transition from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism and continued to stabilize German inflation. The second period is characterized by an expanding ECB arsenal of credit facilities to European banks and sovereigns.
欧元为何贬值
在欧元诞生20周年之际,它仍未扩大其作为国际货币的作用。我们用一系列广泛的指标记录了这一事实,包括人民币在汇率安排中的锚定或参考作用——我们认为这是一种混合措施——以及作为贸易和资产计价货币的作用。在所有这些方面,欧元所占的份额都远远小于美元。此外,这一比例自1999年以来基本保持不变。从某些方面来看,欧元的作用并不比它所取代的德国马克和法国法郎大。我们将探讨这种表现不佳的原因。虽然主要的锚定货币可能具有自然垄断地位,但还有许多其他因素限制了欧元的影响力,包括缺乏金融中心、地缘政治影响力有限,以及美国和中国在技术研究方面的主导地位。在我们看来,最重要的是(安全的)欧元计价资产的相对稀缺供应,我们对此进行了记录。欧洲央行(ECB)缺乏政策明确性可能也起到了一定作用。我们表明,欧元时代可以分为“德国央行+”时期和“不惜一切代价”时期。第一份报告显示,德国从欧洲汇率机制平稳过渡,并继续稳定通胀。第二个阶段的特点是,欧洲央行向欧洲银行和主权国家提供的信贷工具不断扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信