‘Philosophizing with’

Nina Bonderup Dohn
{"title":"‘Philosophizing with’","authors":"Nina Bonderup Dohn","doi":"10.7146/claw.v5i1.108096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I shall present key points from my dr.phil thesis (Higher Doctorate/Habilitation), Epistemological concerns – querying the learning field from a philosophical point of view (Dohn, 2017).1 The aim is to provide an overview of the thesis and to present its main argument for a form of applied philosophy where philosophy takes on the role of dialogue partner with a voice of its own. By way of illustration, I shall highlight some of the issues I have engaged with in this role as well as the answers which dialogue with other disciplines has led me to as regards these issues. First, I present the field, aim, and structure of the thesis. Second, I explicate what I mean by ‘philosophizing with’ and point out four different ways in which one can undertake this venture. Philosophy may dialogue with many disciplines in many areas; the ones I have engaged with fall within the learning field. To further the comprehensibility of my more specific concerns within this field, in the third section I articulate the philosophical outset from which I speak: With inspiration from Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Wittgenstein and Dreyfus, I hold a view of human existence as being-in-the-world and an approach to knowledge as fundamentally involving tacit aspects. This outset is developed throughout the thesis, in dialogue with other disciplines. In section four, I briefly present the resulting philosophical view of knowledge. In section five, I articulate more specifically a number of the issues within the learning field which have helped me develop this view. Section six conversely summarizes some key points which my philosophizing with on these issues have led me to contribute to the disciplines. I end with a few concluding remarks on concerns to engage with in continuation from the results of my thesis.","PeriodicalId":355346,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Language at Work","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Language at Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/claw.v5i1.108096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, I shall present key points from my dr.phil thesis (Higher Doctorate/Habilitation), Epistemological concerns – querying the learning field from a philosophical point of view (Dohn, 2017).1 The aim is to provide an overview of the thesis and to present its main argument for a form of applied philosophy where philosophy takes on the role of dialogue partner with a voice of its own. By way of illustration, I shall highlight some of the issues I have engaged with in this role as well as the answers which dialogue with other disciplines has led me to as regards these issues. First, I present the field, aim, and structure of the thesis. Second, I explicate what I mean by ‘philosophizing with’ and point out four different ways in which one can undertake this venture. Philosophy may dialogue with many disciplines in many areas; the ones I have engaged with fall within the learning field. To further the comprehensibility of my more specific concerns within this field, in the third section I articulate the philosophical outset from which I speak: With inspiration from Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Wittgenstein and Dreyfus, I hold a view of human existence as being-in-the-world and an approach to knowledge as fundamentally involving tacit aspects. This outset is developed throughout the thesis, in dialogue with other disciplines. In section four, I briefly present the resulting philosophical view of knowledge. In section five, I articulate more specifically a number of the issues within the learning field which have helped me develop this view. Section six conversely summarizes some key points which my philosophizing with on these issues have led me to contribute to the disciplines. I end with a few concluding remarks on concerns to engage with in continuation from the results of my thesis.
Philosophizing with’
在这篇文章中,我将介绍我的博士论文(高等博士学位/实习)的关键点,认识论的关注-从哲学的角度询问学习领域(Dohn, 2017)目的是提供论文的概述,并提出其主要论点的一种形式的应用哲学,其中哲学以自己的声音承担对话伙伴的角色。通过说明,我将强调我在这个角色中所涉及的一些问题,以及与其他学科的对话使我对这些问题得出的答案。首先,介绍了本文的研究领域、目的和结构。其次,我解释了我所说的“哲学思考”是什么意思,并指出了人们可以进行这种冒险的四种不同方式。哲学可以与许多领域的许多学科进行对话;我接触过的都属于学习领域。为了进一步理解我在这个领域中更具体的关注,在第三部分中,我阐明了我演讲的哲学起点:在海德格尔、梅洛-庞蒂、维特根斯坦和德雷福斯的启发下,我认为人类存在是世界中的存在,而知识的方法从根本上涉及到默示方面。在与其他学科的对话中,这一开端贯穿于整个论文。在第四节中,我简要地介绍了由此产生的哲学知识观。在第五部分,我更具体地阐述了学习领域中的一些问题,这些问题帮助我形成了这一观点。第六节反过来总结了我对这些问题的哲学思考导致我对这些学科做出贡献的一些关键点。最后,我将以几句结论性的评论来继续我论文的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信