Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for Automatic Coronary Stenosis Detection in X-ray Angiography

V. Danilov, O. Gerget, K. Klyshnikov, E. Ovcharenko, Alejandro F Frangi
{"title":"Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for Automatic Coronary Stenosis Detection in X-ray Angiography","authors":"V. Danilov, O. Gerget, K. Klyshnikov, E. Ovcharenko, Alejandro F Frangi","doi":"10.51130/graphicon-2020-2-3-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the application of machine learning approach to detect both single-vessel and multivessel coronary artery disease from X-ray angiography. Since the interpretation of coronary angiography images requires interventional cardiologists to have considerable training, our study is aimed at analysing, training, and assessing the potential of the existing object detectors for classifying and detecting coronary artery stenosis using angiographic imaging series. 100 patients who underwent coronary angiography at the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases were retrospectively enrolled in the study. To automate the medical data analysis, we examined and compared three models (SSD MobileNet V1, Faster-RCNN ResNet-50 V1, FasterRCNN NASNet) with various architecture, network complexity, and a number of weights. To compare developed deep learning models, we used the mean Average Precision (mAP) metric, training time, and inference time. Testing results show that the training/inference time is directly proportional to the model complexity. Thus, Faster-RCNN NASNet demonstrates the slowest inference time. Its mean inference time per one image made up 880 ms. In terms of accuracy, FasterRCNN ResNet-50 V1 demonstrates the highest prediction accuracy. This model has reached the mAP metric of 0.92 on the validation dataset. SSD MobileNet V1 has demonstrated the best inference time with the inference rate of 23 frames per second.","PeriodicalId":344054,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). Part 2","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). Part 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51130/graphicon-2020-2-3-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article explores the application of machine learning approach to detect both single-vessel and multivessel coronary artery disease from X-ray angiography. Since the interpretation of coronary angiography images requires interventional cardiologists to have considerable training, our study is aimed at analysing, training, and assessing the potential of the existing object detectors for classifying and detecting coronary artery stenosis using angiographic imaging series. 100 patients who underwent coronary angiography at the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases were retrospectively enrolled in the study. To automate the medical data analysis, we examined and compared three models (SSD MobileNet V1, Faster-RCNN ResNet-50 V1, FasterRCNN NASNet) with various architecture, network complexity, and a number of weights. To compare developed deep learning models, we used the mean Average Precision (mAP) metric, training time, and inference time. Testing results show that the training/inference time is directly proportional to the model complexity. Thus, Faster-RCNN NASNet demonstrates the slowest inference time. Its mean inference time per one image made up 880 ms. In terms of accuracy, FasterRCNN ResNet-50 V1 demonstrates the highest prediction accuracy. This model has reached the mAP metric of 0.92 on the validation dataset. SSD MobileNet V1 has demonstrated the best inference time with the inference rate of 23 frames per second.
x线血管造影中冠状动脉狭窄自动检测的深度学习模型比较研究
本文探讨了机器学习方法在x线血管造影中检测单血管和多血管冠状动脉疾病中的应用。由于冠状动脉造影图像的解释需要介入心脏病专家接受大量培训,因此我们的研究旨在分析、培训和评估现有目标检测器的潜力,以利用血管造影成像系列对冠状动脉狭窄进行分类和检测。100名在心血管疾病复杂问题研究所接受冠状动脉造影的患者被回顾性地纳入了这项研究。为了自动化医疗数据分析,我们检查并比较了三种模型(SSD MobileNet V1、Faster-RCNN ResNet-50 V1、Faster-RCNN NASNet),它们具有不同的架构、网络复杂性和许多权重。为了比较已开发的深度学习模型,我们使用了平均精度(mAP)度量、训练时间和推理时间。测试结果表明,训练/推理时间与模型复杂度成正比。因此,Faster-RCNN NASNet展示了最慢的推理时间。每幅图像的平均推理时间为880 ms。在精度方面,FasterRCNN ResNet-50 V1的预测精度最高。该模型在验证数据集上达到了0.92的mAP度量。SSD MobileNet V1已经证明了最佳的推理时间,推理率为每秒23帧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信