The Urgency of Protecting Netizen in Freedom of Speech on Social Media

Grandis Ayuning Priyanto, M. Sardi
{"title":"The Urgency of Protecting Netizen in Freedom of Speech on Social Media","authors":"Grandis Ayuning Priyanto, M. Sardi","doi":"10.18196/MLS.V2I1.11480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of speech is a part of fundamental rights to every people. Nowadays, freedom of speech could not felt widely to all people. Freedom of speech developed until Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights assure and restrict freedom of speech. In Indonesia, since the rise of The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction, the restriction of freedom of speech become biased, many words in social media are presumably attack others. Netizen feels security to speak up is limited, such Ruslan Buton who critics and record about President Jokowi deemed as a hoax and hate speech. Even though some articles in 1945 Constitution have already protect and guarantee all people to bear the right to speak. The limitations of Freedom of speech in The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction emerge multi interpretation which the right to speak have not been correspond with the values in 1945 Constitution. To harmonize freedom of speech in Indonesia, it needs cooperation among government and people to eradicate ambiguity and fear in which already happen.By using juridical-normative method, the research aims to understand the condition of freedom of speech in Indonesia, and to understand the protection of netizen in using social media","PeriodicalId":272345,"journal":{"name":"Media of Law and Sharia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media of Law and Sharia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/MLS.V2I1.11480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Freedom of speech is a part of fundamental rights to every people. Nowadays, freedom of speech could not felt widely to all people. Freedom of speech developed until Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights assure and restrict freedom of speech. In Indonesia, since the rise of The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction, the restriction of freedom of speech become biased, many words in social media are presumably attack others. Netizen feels security to speak up is limited, such Ruslan Buton who critics and record about President Jokowi deemed as a hoax and hate speech. Even though some articles in 1945 Constitution have already protect and guarantee all people to bear the right to speak. The limitations of Freedom of speech in The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction emerge multi interpretation which the right to speak have not been correspond with the values in 1945 Constitution. To harmonize freedom of speech in Indonesia, it needs cooperation among government and people to eradicate ambiguity and fear in which already happen.By using juridical-normative method, the research aims to understand the condition of freedom of speech in Indonesia, and to understand the protection of netizen in using social media
社交媒体中保护网民言论自由的紧迫性
言论自由是每个民族的基本权利之一。如今,言论自由并不是所有人都能广泛感受到的。言论自由发展到《世界人权宣言》和《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》保证和限制言论自由。在印尼,自从《信息与电子交易法》的兴起,对言论自由的限制变得偏颇,社交媒体上的许多言论可能是攻击他人的。网民感到发言的安全是有限的,比如批评和记录总统佐科维的鲁斯兰·布顿被认为是恶作剧和仇恨言论。尽管1945年宪法的一些条款已经保护和保障了所有人的话语权。《信息电子交易法》中对言论自由的限制出现了多种解释,言论权利与1945年宪法的价值观并不相符。为了协调印尼的言论自由,它需要政府和人民之间的合作,以消除已经发生的模棱两可和恐惧。通过运用司法规范的方法,本研究旨在了解印尼的言论自由状况,并了解网民在使用社交媒体时受到的保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信