Comparison of Helsinki CT and Rotterdam CT Scoring Systems As Prognostic Factors of Brain Injury

K. Yap, A. Islam, A. Ihwan, J. Baan, F. Hamid
{"title":"Comparison of Helsinki CT and Rotterdam CT Scoring Systems As Prognostic Factors of Brain Injury","authors":"K. Yap, A. Islam, A. Ihwan, J. Baan, F. Hamid","doi":"10.20956/nmsj.v6i1.13967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. Computerized Tomography (CT) scanning of the brain is essential for diagnostic screening in need of neurosurgical intervention and also provide information about patient prognosis. Methods: This study is a retrospective study design to assess the comparison of the CT scan scoring system of the head with the prognostic factors of brain injury. Head CT Scans were assessed according to the following Rotterdam and Helsinki CT Scores. All patients were managed according to standard guidelines. Surgery was performed as indicated. The primary objective was mortality assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge and 3 months after. Results: Altogether, 60 patients were included. The results of the ROC analysis of the two CT scoring systems, the Helsinki score provided a better sensitivity score> 80% compared to the Rotterdam score, with a positive predictive value of around 74% each for assessing the outcome (GOS) of brain injury patients Conclusions: The Helsinki score scoring system provides a better sensitivity compared to the Rotterdam score","PeriodicalId":266369,"journal":{"name":"Nusantara Medical Science Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nusantara Medical Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/nmsj.v6i1.13967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. Computerized Tomography (CT) scanning of the brain is essential for diagnostic screening in need of neurosurgical intervention and also provide information about patient prognosis. Methods: This study is a retrospective study design to assess the comparison of the CT scan scoring system of the head with the prognostic factors of brain injury. Head CT Scans were assessed according to the following Rotterdam and Helsinki CT Scores. All patients were managed according to standard guidelines. Surgery was performed as indicated. The primary objective was mortality assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge and 3 months after. Results: Altogether, 60 patients were included. The results of the ROC analysis of the two CT scoring systems, the Helsinki score provided a better sensitivity score> 80% compared to the Rotterdam score, with a positive predictive value of around 74% each for assessing the outcome (GOS) of brain injury patients Conclusions: The Helsinki score scoring system provides a better sensitivity compared to the Rotterdam score
赫尔辛基CT与鹿特丹CT评分系统作为脑损伤预后因素的比较
脑损伤是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。计算机断层扫描(CT)的脑部扫描是必不可少的诊断筛选需要神经外科干预,也提供了有关患者预后的信息。方法:回顾性研究头颅CT扫描评分系统与脑损伤预后因素的比较。根据以下鹿特丹和赫尔辛基CT评分评估头部CT扫描。所有患者均按照标准指南进行治疗。手术按照指示进行。主要目的是使用格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)评估出院时和出院后3个月的死亡率。结果:共纳入60例患者。两种CT评分系统的ROC分析结果显示,与鹿特丹评分相比,赫尔辛基评分提供了更好的敏感性评分> 80%,每种评分的阳性预测值约为74%,用于评估脑损伤患者的预后(GOS)。结论:赫尔辛基评分评分系统比鹿特丹评分提供了更好的敏感性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信