Results of an Exploratory Analysis of PISA 2015 Survey of Student Participation in Outside-School-Time Programs

L. Suter
{"title":"Results of an Exploratory Analysis of PISA 2015 Survey of Student Participation in Outside-School-Time Programs","authors":"L. Suter","doi":"10.3224/IJREE.V7I1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) by the OECD measures student study time during formal school periods and during periods of out-of-school-time (OST). The purpose of these items is to account for differences in country to country achievement levels. However, analyses of the impact of additional study time on student achievement have produced conflicting results across countries. While more time given to a school subject within formal school is positively related to achievement in that topic, more time spent on OST is negatively related to average achievement between and within countries. The paper proposes a reconceptualization of OST and achievement by integrating theoretical frameworks of study time, student abilities, and student feelings of efficacy. The results of a descriptive and conceptual analysis of a set of new survey items in the 2015 PISA for 22 countries shows that students benefit from additional study time by having increased feelings of efficacy in a school subject (such as science) but not in measurable levels of achievement. While country to country levels OST participation rates are different, the patterns of relationships between OST participation, student achievement, and attitudes are similar.","PeriodicalId":365541,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Research on Extended Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Research on Extended Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/IJREE.V7I1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) by the OECD measures student study time during formal school periods and during periods of out-of-school-time (OST). The purpose of these items is to account for differences in country to country achievement levels. However, analyses of the impact of additional study time on student achievement have produced conflicting results across countries. While more time given to a school subject within formal school is positively related to achievement in that topic, more time spent on OST is negatively related to average achievement between and within countries. The paper proposes a reconceptualization of OST and achievement by integrating theoretical frameworks of study time, student abilities, and student feelings of efficacy. The results of a descriptive and conceptual analysis of a set of new survey items in the 2015 PISA for 22 countries shows that students benefit from additional study time by having increased feelings of efficacy in a school subject (such as science) but not in measurable levels of achievement. While country to country levels OST participation rates are different, the patterns of relationships between OST participation, student achievement, and attitudes are similar.
2015年PISA学生参与课外活动调查的探索性分析结果
经合组织的国际学生评估项目(PISA)衡量学生在正规学校期间和校外时间(OST)期间的学习时间。这些项目的目的是说明国家间成就水平的差异。然而,对额外学习时间对学生成绩影响的分析在各国得出了相互矛盾的结果。虽然在正规学校里花更多的时间在一门学科上与该学科的成绩呈正相关,但花更多的时间在OST上与国家之间和国家内部的平均成绩呈负相关。本文通过整合学习时间、学生能力和学生效能感的理论框架,重新定义了英语学习与成就的概念。对2015年22个国家的国际学生评估项目中一系列新调查项目的描述性和概念性分析结果表明,学生受益于额外的学习时间,因为他们在学校科目(如科学)上的效能感增加了,但在可衡量的成就水平上却没有。虽然各国的外语教育参与率不同,但外语教育参与、学生成绩和态度之间的关系模式是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信