New cold war concept amid modern challenges (based on material of English-language press)

N. A. Kovalev
{"title":"New cold war concept amid modern challenges (based on material of English-language press)","authors":"N. A. Kovalev","doi":"10.24833/2410-2423-2022-2-31-18-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of the study of the structure and content of NEW COLD WAR concept, which has a structure similar to COLD WAR concept via conceptual-definitional, functional-representative, comparative and discursive analyses. The research material was text examples of the concept taken from quality English-language press published in the period from 2019 to 2021. The study hypothesizes that despite the fact that the modern global confrontation is new, it has direct roots in the old conflict and is similar to it in the structure, however, due to the evolution of discursive conditions and extralinguistic factors, the content of the concept has changed. The results of the study showed that the notional component has been enriched due to new participants in the confrontation, its methods, its geography and the areas in which this conflict occurs, as well as the coronavirus pandemic. The figurative component has significantly expanded thanks to the emergence of such metaphors as “trade war”, “technological war”, “cyber war”, “vaccine war”, and “hybrid war”. The value component has become more complex due to a positive assessment of the conflict in terms of development opportunities. The NEW COLD WAR concept is a complex dynamically developing concept scenario that requires further detailed research.","PeriodicalId":428469,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics & Polyglot Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics & Polyglot Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2022-2-31-18-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study of the structure and content of NEW COLD WAR concept, which has a structure similar to COLD WAR concept via conceptual-definitional, functional-representative, comparative and discursive analyses. The research material was text examples of the concept taken from quality English-language press published in the period from 2019 to 2021. The study hypothesizes that despite the fact that the modern global confrontation is new, it has direct roots in the old conflict and is similar to it in the structure, however, due to the evolution of discursive conditions and extralinguistic factors, the content of the concept has changed. The results of the study showed that the notional component has been enriched due to new participants in the confrontation, its methods, its geography and the areas in which this conflict occurs, as well as the coronavirus pandemic. The figurative component has significantly expanded thanks to the emergence of such metaphors as “trade war”, “technological war”, “cyber war”, “vaccine war”, and “hybrid war”. The value component has become more complex due to a positive assessment of the conflict in terms of development opportunities. The NEW COLD WAR concept is a complex dynamically developing concept scenario that requires further detailed research.
现代挑战下的新冷战概念(基于英文报刊材料)
本文通过概念-定义、功能-代表、比较和话语分析,介绍了新冷战概念的结构和内容的研究成果,该概念具有与冷战概念相似的结构。研究材料是取自2019年至2021年期间出版的优质英语报刊的概念文本示例。本研究假设,尽管现代全球对抗是新的,但它直接植根于旧冲突,在结构上与旧冲突相似,但由于话语条件和语言外因素的演变,概念的内容发生了变化。研究结果表明,由于对抗的新参与者、冲突的方法、冲突的地理位置和发生冲突的地区,以及冠状病毒大流行,名义上的组成部分得到了充实。由于“贸易战”、“科技战”、“网络战”、“疫苗战”、“混合战”等隐喻的出现,比喻成分大幅扩大。由于从发展机会的角度对冲突进行了积极的评估,价值部分变得更加复杂。新冷战概念是一个复杂的动态发展的概念场景,需要进一步的详细研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信