Hate Speech in Readers’ Comments and the challenge of Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis

Tordue Simon Targema, Joseph M. Lucas
{"title":"Hate Speech in Readers’ Comments and the challenge of Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis","authors":"Tordue Simon Targema, Joseph M. Lucas","doi":"10.22452/jpmm.vol20no2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hate speech is among the most significant communication issues that preoccupy the agenda of relevant governmental agencies and media analysts in contemporary Nigeria. It is an unfortunate phenomenon that manifests in the public sphere, and is fast threatening the fragile democracy which the country is struggling to consolidate. Against this backdrop, this study investigates the nature of readers’ comments on online news sites in the country, their place within the context of hate speech rhetoric, and their implication on democratic consolidation in the country. Hinged on the Social Responsibility Theory, the study employs two research methods- Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and content analysis to investigate the manifestation of hate speech in online readers’ comments. Population of the study comprises 2,530 comments, generated from ten stories on prominent online news platforms in the country. From these, a sample of 250 comments (10% of the population) has been selected systematically for closer examination. Findings reveal that, although quantitatively, positive comments dominate the study population (comprising 60% while negative comments account for the remaining 40%), qualitatively, the trend of discussion is disturbing, as commentators employ the use of hate language, verbal assault, name calling, insults and derogatory words to describe subjects. To this end, the study concludes that readers need to exhibit a high sense of responsibility in the course of interaction on the online comments platforms. Where such responsibility is not self-enforced by commentators, news platforms should remove comments that contain venomous hate language in the interest of national unity, democracy and development.","PeriodicalId":294201,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmm.vol20no2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Hate speech is among the most significant communication issues that preoccupy the agenda of relevant governmental agencies and media analysts in contemporary Nigeria. It is an unfortunate phenomenon that manifests in the public sphere, and is fast threatening the fragile democracy which the country is struggling to consolidate. Against this backdrop, this study investigates the nature of readers’ comments on online news sites in the country, their place within the context of hate speech rhetoric, and their implication on democratic consolidation in the country. Hinged on the Social Responsibility Theory, the study employs two research methods- Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and content analysis to investigate the manifestation of hate speech in online readers’ comments. Population of the study comprises 2,530 comments, generated from ten stories on prominent online news platforms in the country. From these, a sample of 250 comments (10% of the population) has been selected systematically for closer examination. Findings reveal that, although quantitatively, positive comments dominate the study population (comprising 60% while negative comments account for the remaining 40%), qualitatively, the trend of discussion is disturbing, as commentators employ the use of hate language, verbal assault, name calling, insults and derogatory words to describe subjects. To this end, the study concludes that readers need to exhibit a high sense of responsibility in the course of interaction on the online comments platforms. Where such responsibility is not self-enforced by commentators, news platforms should remove comments that contain venomous hate language in the interest of national unity, democracy and development.
尼日利亚读者评论中的仇恨言论与民主巩固的挑战:批判性分析
仇恨言论是当今尼日利亚相关政府机构和媒体分析人士关注的最重要的传播问题之一。这是一个在公共领域表现出来的不幸现象,并迅速威胁到该国正在努力巩固的脆弱的民主。在此背景下,本研究调查了该国在线新闻网站上读者评论的性质,它们在仇恨言论修辞背景下的地位,以及它们对该国民主巩固的影响。本研究以社会责任理论为基础,采用批评话语分析(Critical Discourse Analysis, CDA)和内容分析两种研究方法,对网络读者评论中仇恨言论的表现形式进行研究。该研究包括2530条评论,这些评论来自该国著名在线新闻平台上的10个故事。从这些评论中,系统地选出250条评论(占总人口的10%)进行更仔细的检查。研究结果显示,尽管在数量上,积极的评论占研究人口的主导地位(占60%,而负面评论占其余的40%),但在质量上,讨论的趋势是令人不安的,因为评论员使用仇恨语言,口头攻击,辱骂,侮辱和贬损的词语来描述受试者。为此,本研究得出结论:读者在网络评论平台的互动过程中需要表现出高度的责任感。在评论员不自觉承担责任的情况下,新闻平台应删除含有恶毒仇恨语言的评论,以维护国家团结、民主和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信