UNSUCCESSFUL TOWNS OF THE BAR SURROUNDINGS: YALTUSHKIV, MEZHYRIV, POROSIATKIV, MARIANIVKA, BAROK AND BERLYNTSI

O. Rybchynskyi
{"title":"UNSUCCESSFUL TOWNS OF THE BAR SURROUNDINGS: YALTUSHKIV, MEZHYRIV, POROSIATKIV, MARIANIVKA, BAROK AND BERLYNTSI","authors":"O. Rybchynskyi","doi":"10.23939/fortifications2020.14.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical towns of Ukraine are the subject of numerous interdisciplinary studies. The focus is mainly on those settlements that have preserved the planning composition or have significant historical significance. Instead, towns that have lost opportunities for spatial development remain unnoticed. The purpose of article is to determine the spatial parameters of downtown and individual development anomalies of unsuccessful cities: Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosyatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok and Berlyntsi. Urban factors with varying intensity stimulate the development of settlements. In each example, this happens individually. The formation and long-term formation of the town had hereditary, evolutionary and variable-pulsating properties. Given these characteristics, several cities located in the vicinity of Bar and recorded on the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670 attract attention. These towns had a short period of development and did not differ in the history of the region. Instead, they deserve to examine the peculiarities of formation and restoration historical memory. On the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670, Yaltushkiv is shown with a castle and fortified downtown. The settlement was located on the road that connected Bar with Dunaivtsi. Analysis of the current state of street network and relief allows to delineate boundaries of historic downtown. It had two gates, the main street on which stood the Church of Holy Trinity and Church of Holy Spirit. The market square had the shape of an elongated rectangle. The castle was located in the north-western corner. Preserved regular street network shows that the downtown was built thoughtfully and according to the developed plan. Most likely it happened in the middle of the 16-th century, but due to repeated devastation of the 16 - 20 centuries, no significant buildings and temples have survived. On the map of Podolia Voivodeship in 1670, Mezhyriv is marked as a densely built-up town with a castle. Analysis of current state of the street network and relief helps to determine the boundaries of the ancient fortified city center, the probable location of the gates and the castle complex. On the map of Podolia voivodeship in 1670, Porosyatkiv is shown as a wellfortified town, with bastions and ramparts, but without castle. Instead, the fortification, market and temple have been lost today. The street network allows you to roughly delineate the area of the historic center. On the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670, Maryanivka is shown as a quadrangular fortified town with a castle located near the eastern part of the downtown. An analysis of existing street network and relief shows that the ancient Rynok Square was located near the church, town had ramparts and dry ditches, two gates and a regular type of layout. The castle was rectangular in shape, with ramparts and a moat, located near the road to Kopaygorod. On the map of Podolia Voivodeship in 1670, Berlyntsi is mentioned as a fortified settlement with a castle located on the southern side of downtown. On the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670, Barok is shown as a fortified town with a castle located on the north side of downtown. The essence without the success of towns is concentrated in the reasons that determined their decline. The quality of the potential development of settlement was influenced by natural factors - geographical and topographic location, climate and geology. The analysis of natural properties in each settlement showed that from the very beginning they had significant limitations in spatial development. Consideration of economic factors, namely favorable conditions for the development of handicrafts and trade, the availability of natural resources indicate that Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosyatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok and Berlyntsi were primarily focused on agriculture. The dominance of this vector of settlement activity has negatively affected their functional role in the development of region. An overview of urban planning factor - the development of form and composition of the town show that a clear plan for the creation of the downtown was in Mezhyriv, Yaltushkiv, Berlyntsi, Barok and Maryanivka. Porosyatkiv was planned without prior planning. According to the map of the Podolsk Voivodeship of 1670, the defensive structures of downtown consisted of earthen ramparts, small bastions and wooden fences. On the map of Ricci Zanoni in 1767 it is recorded that Mezhyriv has good fortifications; Porosyatkiv with fortifications (probably scalded); Yaltushkiv, Berlyntsi, Barok and Maryanivka - without fortifications. Thus, the spatial dissolution of the downtown in these towns began in the middle of the XVIII century. An analysis of the towns Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosiatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok and Berlyntsi revealed that from the beginning of their founding and during the two centuries of progress, they had hereditary, evolutionary and variable-pulsating anomalies in development. Instead, this is no reason to neglect their significance for the history of Ukrainian urban planning. On the contrary, these settlements today need a special monument protection status.","PeriodicalId":307059,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Research, Conservation and Restoration of Historic Fortifications","volume":"247 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Research, Conservation and Restoration of Historic Fortifications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/fortifications2020.14.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Historical towns of Ukraine are the subject of numerous interdisciplinary studies. The focus is mainly on those settlements that have preserved the planning composition or have significant historical significance. Instead, towns that have lost opportunities for spatial development remain unnoticed. The purpose of article is to determine the spatial parameters of downtown and individual development anomalies of unsuccessful cities: Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosyatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok and Berlyntsi. Urban factors with varying intensity stimulate the development of settlements. In each example, this happens individually. The formation and long-term formation of the town had hereditary, evolutionary and variable-pulsating properties. Given these characteristics, several cities located in the vicinity of Bar and recorded on the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670 attract attention. These towns had a short period of development and did not differ in the history of the region. Instead, they deserve to examine the peculiarities of formation and restoration historical memory. On the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670, Yaltushkiv is shown with a castle and fortified downtown. The settlement was located on the road that connected Bar with Dunaivtsi. Analysis of the current state of street network and relief allows to delineate boundaries of historic downtown. It had two gates, the main street on which stood the Church of Holy Trinity and Church of Holy Spirit. The market square had the shape of an elongated rectangle. The castle was located in the north-western corner. Preserved regular street network shows that the downtown was built thoughtfully and according to the developed plan. Most likely it happened in the middle of the 16-th century, but due to repeated devastation of the 16 - 20 centuries, no significant buildings and temples have survived. On the map of Podolia Voivodeship in 1670, Mezhyriv is marked as a densely built-up town with a castle. Analysis of current state of the street network and relief helps to determine the boundaries of the ancient fortified city center, the probable location of the gates and the castle complex. On the map of Podolia voivodeship in 1670, Porosyatkiv is shown as a wellfortified town, with bastions and ramparts, but without castle. Instead, the fortification, market and temple have been lost today. The street network allows you to roughly delineate the area of the historic center. On the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670, Maryanivka is shown as a quadrangular fortified town with a castle located near the eastern part of the downtown. An analysis of existing street network and relief shows that the ancient Rynok Square was located near the church, town had ramparts and dry ditches, two gates and a regular type of layout. The castle was rectangular in shape, with ramparts and a moat, located near the road to Kopaygorod. On the map of Podolia Voivodeship in 1670, Berlyntsi is mentioned as a fortified settlement with a castle located on the southern side of downtown. On the map of Podolsk Voivodeship in 1670, Barok is shown as a fortified town with a castle located on the north side of downtown. The essence without the success of towns is concentrated in the reasons that determined their decline. The quality of the potential development of settlement was influenced by natural factors - geographical and topographic location, climate and geology. The analysis of natural properties in each settlement showed that from the very beginning they had significant limitations in spatial development. Consideration of economic factors, namely favorable conditions for the development of handicrafts and trade, the availability of natural resources indicate that Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosyatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok and Berlyntsi were primarily focused on agriculture. The dominance of this vector of settlement activity has negatively affected their functional role in the development of region. An overview of urban planning factor - the development of form and composition of the town show that a clear plan for the creation of the downtown was in Mezhyriv, Yaltushkiv, Berlyntsi, Barok and Maryanivka. Porosyatkiv was planned without prior planning. According to the map of the Podolsk Voivodeship of 1670, the defensive structures of downtown consisted of earthen ramparts, small bastions and wooden fences. On the map of Ricci Zanoni in 1767 it is recorded that Mezhyriv has good fortifications; Porosyatkiv with fortifications (probably scalded); Yaltushkiv, Berlyntsi, Barok and Maryanivka - without fortifications. Thus, the spatial dissolution of the downtown in these towns began in the middle of the XVIII century. An analysis of the towns Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosiatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok and Berlyntsi revealed that from the beginning of their founding and during the two centuries of progress, they had hereditary, evolutionary and variable-pulsating anomalies in development. Instead, this is no reason to neglect their significance for the history of Ukrainian urban planning. On the contrary, these settlements today need a special monument protection status.
酒吧周围不成功的城镇:yaltushkiv, mezhyriv, porosiatkiv, marianivka, barok和berlyntsi
乌克兰的历史城镇是众多跨学科研究的主题。重点关注那些保留了规划构成或具有重要历史意义的聚落。相反,失去空间发展机会的城镇却无人注意。本文的目的是确定市中心的空间参数和不成功城市的个别发展异常:Yaltushkiv, Mezhyriv, Porosyatkiv, Maryanivka, Barok和Berlyntsi。不同强度的城市因素刺激了聚落的发展。在每个例子中,这都是单独发生的。城镇的形成和长期形成具有遗传性、演化性和变脉动性。考虑到这些特点,位于巴尔附近并于1670年记录在波多尔斯克省地图上的几个城市引起了人们的注意。这些城镇的发展时间很短,在该地区的历史上没有什么不同。相反,他们应该审视形成和恢复历史记忆的特殊性。在1670年的波多尔斯克省地图上,耶尔图什科夫有一座城堡和设防的市中心。该定居点位于连接巴尔和杜奈夫茨的公路上。通过对街道网络和地形现状的分析,划定历史城区的边界。它有两个大门,主要街道上矗立着圣三一教堂和圣灵教堂。集市广场呈细长的长方形。城堡位于西北角。保留了规则的街道网络,表明市中心的建设是经过深思熟虑的,并根据制定的计划。它最有可能发生在16世纪中叶,但由于16- 20世纪的反复破坏,没有重要的建筑和寺庙幸存下来。在1670年波多利亚省的地图上,梅日里夫被标记为一个建筑密集的城镇,有一座城堡。对街道网络和浮雕现状的分析有助于确定古代设防城市中心的边界、城门和城堡建筑群的可能位置。在1670年的波多利亚省(Podolia vovodship)地图上,波罗西亚科夫被描绘成一个防御工事森严的城镇,有堡垒和壁垒,但没有城堡。相反,防御工事、市场和寺庙今天已经消失了。街道网可以大致勾勒出历史中心的区域。在1670年波多尔斯克省的地图上,马里亚尼夫卡是一个四边形的设防城镇,靠近市中心的东部有一座城堡。对现有街道网络和浮雕的分析表明,古代的林诺广场位于教堂附近,城镇有城墙和干沟,两个大门和规则的布局。这座城堡呈长方形,有城墙和护城河,位于通往科佩戈罗德的道路附近。在1670年波多利亚省(Podolia Voivodeship)的地图上,柏林茨被称为一个设防的定居点,在市中心的南侧有一座城堡。在1670年波多尔斯克省的地图上,巴鲁克被描绘成一个设防的城镇,市中心的北边有一座城堡。城镇不成功的本质集中在决定其衰落的原因上。聚落潜在开发质量受地理地形位置、气候和地质等自然因素的影响。对每个聚落的自然属性分析表明,从一开始,它们在空间发展上就有明显的局限性。考虑到经济因素,即手工业和贸易发展的有利条件,以及自然资源的可用性,表明耶尔图什科夫、梅日里夫、波罗西亚特科夫、马里亚尼夫卡、巴鲁克和柏林茨主要侧重于农业。这种定居活动载体的主导地位对其在区域发展中的功能作用产生了负面影响。对城市规划因素的概述-城镇的形式和组成的发展表明,在梅日里夫,亚图什基夫,柏林,巴鲁克和玛丽亚尼夫卡建立了一个明确的市中心计划。波罗西亚基夫是在没有事先计划的情况下被策划的。根据1670年波多尔斯克省的地图,市中心的防御结构由土墙、小堡垒和木栅栏组成。在利玛奇·扎诺尼(Ricci Zanoni) 1767年绘制的地图上,记录了梅日里夫有良好的防御工事;波罗西亚科夫与防御工事(可能被烫伤);耶尔图什科夫、柏林、巴鲁克和马里亚尼夫卡——没有防御工事。因此,这些城镇的市中心在空间上的解体始于18世纪中期。对Yaltushkiv、Mezhyriv、Porosiatkiv、Maryanivka、Barok和Berlyntsi这些城镇的分析表明,从它们建立之初到两个世纪的发展过程中,它们在发展中存在遗传、进化和变化的异常现象。 相反,没有理由忽视它们在乌克兰城市规划史上的重要性。相反,这些定居点今天需要一个特殊的纪念碑保护地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信