Quality Micro-decision-making at Selected Philippine Public Secondary Schools: An Iterative Process of Planning and Implementing the Curriculum

Joana Paula Biñas, Nordy D. Siason, Rex Paulino
{"title":"Quality Micro-decision-making at Selected Philippine Public Secondary Schools: An Iterative Process of Planning and Implementing the Curriculum","authors":"Joana Paula Biñas, Nordy D. Siason, Rex Paulino","doi":"10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.5.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Philippine K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum advances with the trends and developments in society and adapts to the sudden shifts of demands and restrictions for the effective delivery of a 21st–century education. The onset of School-Based Management (SBM) has given birth to rapid changes in the Department of Education (DepEd) these past years. Through the SBM, micro-level decision-making has been made to address the unique issues faced by a school which eventually developed a strategy for maximizing local resources for school development. The School Improvement Plan (SIP) has answered the continuing complexities in school management, notwithstanding the volatile education landscape in the new normal. This exploratory multiple case study looked into five (5) selected public secondary schools in the Philippines. It also uncovered constraints in setting plans and empowering the stakeholders to forge a larger school community. Data sources were survey questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis through the school records. Considering different school categories, populations of learners and teachers, and types of educational leadership, the different views of educational institutions on planning improvements vis-à-vis the DepEd-mandated procedures on formulation and implementation of the SIP surfaced from the data. It is hoped that the investigation’s findings provide meaningful insights into crafting strategies to highlight the essence of stakeholders’ participation, especially in the planning phase. Although results revealed that schools’ have varied ways of making a SIP, each considered an informed, community-based preparation stage as an arduous capsulized plan, with an end in mind, to achieve an outcomes-based education. Notably, all DepEd schools share one set of vision, mission, and core values. School leadership matters the most in such an iterative process. Hence, school heads and their leadership style must cater to flexibility in contextualizing not only the SIP formulation but also its implementation.","PeriodicalId":431386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.5.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Philippine K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum advances with the trends and developments in society and adapts to the sudden shifts of demands and restrictions for the effective delivery of a 21st–century education. The onset of School-Based Management (SBM) has given birth to rapid changes in the Department of Education (DepEd) these past years. Through the SBM, micro-level decision-making has been made to address the unique issues faced by a school which eventually developed a strategy for maximizing local resources for school development. The School Improvement Plan (SIP) has answered the continuing complexities in school management, notwithstanding the volatile education landscape in the new normal. This exploratory multiple case study looked into five (5) selected public secondary schools in the Philippines. It also uncovered constraints in setting plans and empowering the stakeholders to forge a larger school community. Data sources were survey questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis through the school records. Considering different school categories, populations of learners and teachers, and types of educational leadership, the different views of educational institutions on planning improvements vis-à-vis the DepEd-mandated procedures on formulation and implementation of the SIP surfaced from the data. It is hoped that the investigation’s findings provide meaningful insights into crafting strategies to highlight the essence of stakeholders’ participation, especially in the planning phase. Although results revealed that schools’ have varied ways of making a SIP, each considered an informed, community-based preparation stage as an arduous capsulized plan, with an end in mind, to achieve an outcomes-based education. Notably, all DepEd schools share one set of vision, mission, and core values. School leadership matters the most in such an iterative process. Hence, school heads and their leadership style must cater to flexibility in contextualizing not only the SIP formulation but also its implementation.
菲律宾公立中学的质量微观决策:课程规划和实施的迭代过程
菲律宾K至12基础教育课程随着社会的趋势和发展而发展,并适应21世纪教育有效交付的需求和限制的突然变化。校本管理(SBM)的兴起使教育部(DepEd)在过去的几年里发生了迅速的变化。通过SBM,微观层面的决策可以解决学校面临的独特问题,最终制定出一项战略,最大限度地利用当地资源促进学校发展。在新常态下,虽然教育环境变幻莫测,但学校改善计划已解决了学校管理方面的复杂问题。本探索性多案例研究调查了菲律宾五所选定的公立中学。它还揭示了在制定计划和授权利益相关者建立更大的学校社区方面的制约因素。数据来源为调查问卷、半结构化访谈和通过学校档案进行文献分析。考虑到不同的学校类别,不同的学习者和教师群体,以及不同类型的教育领导,教育机构在规划改进方面的不同观点从数据中浮出水面-à-vis教育部规定的制定和实施SIP的程序。希望调查结果能为制定战略提供有意义的见解,以突出利益相关者参与的本质,特别是在规划阶段。虽然结果显示,学校有不同的方式来制定SIP,但每个学校都认为一个知情的、以社区为基础的准备阶段是一个艰巨的浓缩计划,目的是实现以结果为基础的教育。值得注意的是,所有DepEd学院都有一个共同的愿景、使命和核心价值观。在这样一个迭代的过程中,学校领导最重要。因此,学校校长和他们的领导风格必须适应环境的灵活性,不仅是制定SIP,而且是实施SIP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信