Comparative analysis of sensing schemes for multilevel non-volatile memories

C. Calligaro, A. Manstretta, A. Pierin, G. Torelli
{"title":"Comparative analysis of sensing schemes for multilevel non-volatile memories","authors":"C. Calligaro, A. Manstretta, A. Pierin, G. Torelli","doi":"10.1109/ICISS.1997.630269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading multilevel non-volatile memories is a very demanding task. Three sensing techniques (the parallel scheme, the binary-serial scheme and the mixed parallel-serial scheme) are considered here. Their operation principles are described and a comparative evaluation in terms of both access time and circuit complexity is carried out. The parallel approach is the most suitable for 4-level-cell memories (2 bit per cell). The mixed approach seems to be the most attractive for a large number of programmable levels (at least 16 levels per cell). In this case, the sensing area overhead is limited to less than 1% of the memory array while access time penalty is less than 50%.","PeriodicalId":357602,"journal":{"name":"1997 Proceedings Second Annual IEEE International Conference on Innovative Systems in Silicon","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1997 Proceedings Second Annual IEEE International Conference on Innovative Systems in Silicon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS.1997.630269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Reading multilevel non-volatile memories is a very demanding task. Three sensing techniques (the parallel scheme, the binary-serial scheme and the mixed parallel-serial scheme) are considered here. Their operation principles are described and a comparative evaluation in terms of both access time and circuit complexity is carried out. The parallel approach is the most suitable for 4-level-cell memories (2 bit per cell). The mixed approach seems to be the most attractive for a large number of programmable levels (at least 16 levels per cell). In this case, the sensing area overhead is limited to less than 1% of the memory array while access time penalty is less than 50%.
多电平非易失性存储器传感方案的比较分析
读取多电平非易失性存储器是一项非常苛刻的任务。本文考虑了三种传感技术(并联方案、二值串行方案和并联串行混合方案)。描述了它们的工作原理,并在访问时间和电路复杂度方面进行了比较评价。并行方法最适合4级单元存储器(每个单元2位)。对于大量可编程关卡(每个单元至少16个关卡),混合方法似乎最具吸引力。在这种情况下,传感区域开销被限制在小于内存阵列的1%,而访问时间损失小于50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信