La Evaluación Comprensiva de Programas Educativos: ¿Un Nuevo Paradigma Teórico?

Rafael López-Meseguer, Manuel T. Valdés
{"title":"La Evaluación Comprensiva de Programas Educativos: ¿Un Nuevo Paradigma Teórico?","authors":"Rafael López-Meseguer, Manuel T. Valdés","doi":"10.15366/riee2020.13.2.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 100th anniversary of Max Weber's death, this paper explores the possibility of translating the principles of \"Comprehensive Sociology\" to the evaluation of educational programs. To this end, we firstly review the literature on the evaluation of educational programs and establish the relationship between the comprehensive evaluation approach and other approaches. In the second part, we develop the theoretical contribution of this work in terms of the construction of the evaluation object. In particular, special attention is dedicated to the understanding of educational programmes as social relations and the evaluation of programs based on the analysis of their logical coherence and its causal correspondence. In the third part, we define the limits to value judgments in the evaluation practice. In line with Weber, we argue that, while evaluators should not make value judgements, it does not mean that participants' value judgements cannot be evaluated. In fact, they are a central element in the evaluation approach that we present. Finally, the articulation of qualitative and quantitative techniques is proposed as the most appropriate methodological strategy given the theoretical prerogatives of comprehensive evaluation.","PeriodicalId":166932,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2020.13.2.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the 100th anniversary of Max Weber's death, this paper explores the possibility of translating the principles of "Comprehensive Sociology" to the evaluation of educational programs. To this end, we firstly review the literature on the evaluation of educational programs and establish the relationship between the comprehensive evaluation approach and other approaches. In the second part, we develop the theoretical contribution of this work in terms of the construction of the evaluation object. In particular, special attention is dedicated to the understanding of educational programmes as social relations and the evaluation of programs based on the analysis of their logical coherence and its causal correspondence. In the third part, we define the limits to value judgments in the evaluation practice. In line with Weber, we argue that, while evaluators should not make value judgements, it does not mean that participants' value judgements cannot be evaluated. In fact, they are a central element in the evaluation approach that we present. Finally, the articulation of qualitative and quantitative techniques is proposed as the most appropriate methodological strategy given the theoretical prerogatives of comprehensive evaluation.
教育项目综合评价:一种新的理论范式?
在马克斯·韦伯逝世100周年之际,本文探讨了将“综合社会学”的原则转化为教育项目评价的可能性。为此,我们首先回顾了有关教育项目评价的文献,并建立了综合评价方法与其他方法之间的关系。第二部分从评价对象的构建方面阐述了本文的理论贡献。特别要注意的是,将教育计划理解为社会关系,并基于对其逻辑一致性及其因果对应性的分析来评估计划。第三部分界定了评价实践中价值判断的界限。根据韦伯的观点,我们认为,虽然评价者不应该做出价值判断,但这并不意味着参与者的价值判断不能被评估。事实上,它们是我们提出的评估方法的核心要素。最后,考虑到综合评价的理论优势,定性和定量技术的结合被认为是最合适的方法策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信