Cultivating Creative Coexistence(s): towards a critical education for creativity praxis to construct fairer human coexistences

E. Schultz, L. S. García, Laís Affornali Fernandes, Mateus Ribamar Paixão, Fernanda Kawasaki, R. Pereira
{"title":"Cultivating Creative Coexistence(s): towards a critical education for creativity praxis to construct fairer human coexistences","authors":"E. Schultz, L. S. García, Laís Affornali Fernandes, Mateus Ribamar Paixão, Fernanda Kawasaki, R. Pereira","doi":"10.1145/3385010.3385019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creative education is a central theme in a world where the division between human and intelligent machines produces new work and social relationships. Many researchers and educators reproduce a controversial discourse where being creative is mandatory to ”succeed” professionally and personally in the Creative Society. Situated in a participatory action research project conducted with socioeconomically vulnerable young people and their social educators in Brazil, we draw on learned lessons from this project to challenge such a discourse by introducing the notion of Creative Coexistence(s). We introduce this notion and discuss four pillars that sustain it and give people a base to promote creativity as a means to produce fairer human coexistence(s). By developing a critical discussion on the literature, and by presenting five scenarios on creative coexistence(s) activities, we elaborate and discuss the four pillars to cultivate creative coexistence(s): 1.Questioning the Creative Society, 2.Freirean-Papertian praxis, 3.Young people as (re)makers, and 4.Coexistence-centered experiences.","PeriodicalId":137886,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Creative education is a central theme in a world where the division between human and intelligent machines produces new work and social relationships. Many researchers and educators reproduce a controversial discourse where being creative is mandatory to ”succeed” professionally and personally in the Creative Society. Situated in a participatory action research project conducted with socioeconomically vulnerable young people and their social educators in Brazil, we draw on learned lessons from this project to challenge such a discourse by introducing the notion of Creative Coexistence(s). We introduce this notion and discuss four pillars that sustain it and give people a base to promote creativity as a means to produce fairer human coexistence(s). By developing a critical discussion on the literature, and by presenting five scenarios on creative coexistence(s) activities, we elaborate and discuss the four pillars to cultivate creative coexistence(s): 1.Questioning the Creative Society, 2.Freirean-Papertian praxis, 3.Young people as (re)makers, and 4.Coexistence-centered experiences.
培养创造性共存:对创造性实践进行批判性教育,以构建更公平的人类共存
在一个人类和智能机器之间的分裂产生新的工作和社会关系的世界里,创造性教育是一个中心主题。许多研究人员和教育工作者重复了一种有争议的话语,即创造性是在创造性社会中职业和个人“成功”的必要条件。我们位于一个参与性行动研究项目中,该项目由巴西的社会经济弱势青年及其社会教育工作者开展,我们从这个项目中吸取经验教训,通过引入创造性共存的概念来挑战这种话语。我们介绍了这一概念,并讨论了支撑它的四大支柱,并为人们提供了一个促进创造力的基础,以此作为实现更公平的人类共存的手段。通过对文献进行批判性的讨论,并通过提出创造性共存活动的五个场景,我们详细阐述和讨论了培养创造性共存的四个支柱:1。质疑创意社会,2。弗里林-派珀实践,3。4.年轻人是创造者。Coexistence-centered经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信