I. W. Suwatra, A. Agung, I. M. Tegeh, Luh Putu Putrini Mahadewi
{"title":"The Effect of Tri Hita Karana Oriented Blended Learning Model on Students Character and Learning Outcomes at the Faculty of Education, Undiksha","authors":"I. W. Suwatra, A. Agung, I. M. Tegeh, Luh Putu Putrini Mahadewi","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study adapts the blended learning model. This model was chosen to overcome the weaknesses that occur in conventional learning activities. This study examines the effect of Tri Hita Karana-oriented Blended Learning in improving the character and learning outcomes of students at the Faculty of Education, Undiksha. The research aims to determine the differences in character and learning outcomes between students who learn using the Tri Hita Karana oriented blended learning model with the Direct instruction learning model. This research is a quantitative research with a quasi-experimental approach. The research design was a posttest only control group design. The population in this study were all students of the Faculty of Education which about 1719 people. The research sample was determined by using purposive sampling technique. The instruments used were character observation sheets and learning outcomes tests. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential t-test statistics. The results showed that there were 2 subjects that had significant differences in learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class, namely (1) Introduction to Educational Technology and (2) Descriptive Statistics. Two other subjects, namely (1) Student Development and (2) Early Childhood Mathematics Education, shows that there is no significant difference in learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class. In the character variable, there were significant differences in the character of students in the Introduction to Educational Technology and Descriptive Statistics courses, while in the Student Development and Early Childhood Mathematics Education courses there was no significant","PeriodicalId":426687,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study adapts the blended learning model. This model was chosen to overcome the weaknesses that occur in conventional learning activities. This study examines the effect of Tri Hita Karana-oriented Blended Learning in improving the character and learning outcomes of students at the Faculty of Education, Undiksha. The research aims to determine the differences in character and learning outcomes between students who learn using the Tri Hita Karana oriented blended learning model with the Direct instruction learning model. This research is a quantitative research with a quasi-experimental approach. The research design was a posttest only control group design. The population in this study were all students of the Faculty of Education which about 1719 people. The research sample was determined by using purposive sampling technique. The instruments used were character observation sheets and learning outcomes tests. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential t-test statistics. The results showed that there were 2 subjects that had significant differences in learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class, namely (1) Introduction to Educational Technology and (2) Descriptive Statistics. Two other subjects, namely (1) Student Development and (2) Early Childhood Mathematics Education, shows that there is no significant difference in learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class. In the character variable, there were significant differences in the character of students in the Introduction to Educational Technology and Descriptive Statistics courses, while in the Student Development and Early Childhood Mathematics Education courses there was no significant