The Diagnostic Patterns of Referring Physicians and Hospital Expert Psychiatrists Regarding Particular Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Clinical and Neuropathological Subtypes.

Shunichiro Shinagawa, Ito Kawakami, Emi Takasaki, M. Shigeta, T. Arai, Manabu Ikeda
{"title":"The Diagnostic Patterns of Referring Physicians and Hospital Expert Psychiatrists Regarding Particular Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Clinical and Neuropathological Subtypes.","authors":"Shunichiro Shinagawa, Ito Kawakami, Emi Takasaki, M. Shigeta, T. Arai, Manabu Ikeda","doi":"10.3233/jad-215516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIt is important to make accurate clinical diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), which in turn, leads to future therapic approaches. The FTLD cases are frequently inaccurately identified, but the frequency of this misidentification according to the underlying pathological subtypes is still unclear.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nWe aimed to quantify the accuracy of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) diagnoses by both the patients' referring physicians and hospital expert psychiatrists, and we investigated whether the physicians' and psychiatrists' diagnostic patterns are associated with a specific neuropathology.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe retrospectively analyzed the cases of a series of Japanese patients with pathologically diagnosed FTLD (n = 55): the bvFTD group (n = 47) consisted of patients with FTLD-tau (n = 20), FTLD-TDP (TAR DNA-binding protein of 43-kDA) (n = 19), and FTLD-FUS (fused in sarcoma) (n = 8). The svPPA patients (n = 8) all had FTLD-TDP.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOnly 31% of the patients' referring physicians mentioned FTD syndrome. The referring psychiatrists and neurologists showed similar diagnostic accuracy. High diagnostic accuracy was observed for the TDP pathology group (mainly svPPA patients). The FTLD-FUS patients were more likely to be diagnosed as having a psychiatric disorder by referring physicians. The hospital expert psychiatrists' accuracy for identifying FTLD-tau pathology was low.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe results of our analyses revealed a specific diagnostic pattern associated with particular FTLD pathological subtypes, which will help to improve non-specialists' diagnostic ability.","PeriodicalId":219895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-215516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND It is important to make accurate clinical diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), which in turn, leads to future therapic approaches. The FTLD cases are frequently inaccurately identified, but the frequency of this misidentification according to the underlying pathological subtypes is still unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to quantify the accuracy of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) diagnoses by both the patients' referring physicians and hospital expert psychiatrists, and we investigated whether the physicians' and psychiatrists' diagnostic patterns are associated with a specific neuropathology. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the cases of a series of Japanese patients with pathologically diagnosed FTLD (n = 55): the bvFTD group (n = 47) consisted of patients with FTLD-tau (n = 20), FTLD-TDP (TAR DNA-binding protein of 43-kDA) (n = 19), and FTLD-FUS (fused in sarcoma) (n = 8). The svPPA patients (n = 8) all had FTLD-TDP. RESULTS Only 31% of the patients' referring physicians mentioned FTD syndrome. The referring psychiatrists and neurologists showed similar diagnostic accuracy. High diagnostic accuracy was observed for the TDP pathology group (mainly svPPA patients). The FTLD-FUS patients were more likely to be diagnosed as having a psychiatric disorder by referring physicians. The hospital expert psychiatrists' accuracy for identifying FTLD-tau pathology was low. CONCLUSION The results of our analyses revealed a specific diagnostic pattern associated with particular FTLD pathological subtypes, which will help to improve non-specialists' diagnostic ability.
转诊医师和医院专家精神科医师对特定额颞叶变性临床和神经病理亚型的诊断模式
背景:准确的临床诊断额颞叶变性(FTLD)是非常重要的,这反过来又会导致未来的治疗方法。FTLD病例经常被不准确地识别,但根据潜在病理亚型,这种错误识别的频率仍不清楚。目的:我们旨在量化患者转诊医生和医院专家精神科医生对行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)和语义变异性原发性进行性失语症(svPPA)诊断的准确性,并调查医生和精神科医生的诊断模式是否与特定神经病理学相关。方法回顾性分析病理诊断为FTLD的一系列日本患者(n = 55): bvFTD组(n = 47)包括FTLD-tau (n = 20)、FTLD- tdp (43-kDA的TAR dna结合蛋白)(n = 19)和FTLD- fus(融合肉瘤)(n = 8)。svPPA患者(n = 8)均有FTLD-TDP。结果仅31%的患者转诊医师提及FTD综合征。转诊精神科医生和神经科医生的诊断准确性相似。TDP病理组(主要为svPPA患者)诊断准确率较高。FTLD-FUS患者更有可能被转诊医生诊断为患有精神障碍。医院专家精神科医师鉴定FTLD-tau病理的准确性较低。结论我们的分析结果揭示了与特定FTLD病理亚型相关的特定诊断模式,有助于提高非专业人员的诊断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信