High Reliability Organizing, Resiliency and Safety Culture

Yalda Khashe, N. Meshkati
{"title":"High Reliability Organizing, Resiliency and Safety Culture","authors":"Yalda Khashe, N. Meshkati","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complex safety-critical technological system breakdowns could pose serious threats for workers and the surrounding communities. These organizations are inherently complex and depend on the latest technologies to survive and function properly. Failures in these systems are rare but highly visible, making the consequence of such failures disastrous. To survive, a technological system must have the ability to respond to operational anomalies before any undesirable consequences, which the system seeks to avoid, can occur. As task uncertainty increases in complex systems (typical in ‘non-normal’ or emergency situations), the number of exceptions to routine operations increases, overloading the organizational hierarchy. To meet the new challenges, the organization must use another mechanism to sustain itself. The Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21, defines resilience as the ability to “prepare for and adapt to changing conditions and withstand and recover rapidly from disruptions”. Without understanding the vital role of human and organizational factors in technological systems and proactively addressing/facilitating their interactions during unexpected events, recovery will be a sweet dream, and resiliency will only be an unattainable mirage. A High Reliability Organization (HRO)is a resilient organization. These Organizations are a subset of high-risk organizations designed and managed to avoid such accidents. In this paper, we study the influence of HRO characteristics on safety culture, resiliency, and the organizations' ability to respond to unforeseen events.","PeriodicalId":402751,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Systems Interaction","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Systems Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complex safety-critical technological system breakdowns could pose serious threats for workers and the surrounding communities. These organizations are inherently complex and depend on the latest technologies to survive and function properly. Failures in these systems are rare but highly visible, making the consequence of such failures disastrous. To survive, a technological system must have the ability to respond to operational anomalies before any undesirable consequences, which the system seeks to avoid, can occur. As task uncertainty increases in complex systems (typical in ‘non-normal’ or emergency situations), the number of exceptions to routine operations increases, overloading the organizational hierarchy. To meet the new challenges, the organization must use another mechanism to sustain itself. The Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21, defines resilience as the ability to “prepare for and adapt to changing conditions and withstand and recover rapidly from disruptions”. Without understanding the vital role of human and organizational factors in technological systems and proactively addressing/facilitating their interactions during unexpected events, recovery will be a sweet dream, and resiliency will only be an unattainable mirage. A High Reliability Organization (HRO)is a resilient organization. These Organizations are a subset of high-risk organizations designed and managed to avoid such accidents. In this paper, we study the influence of HRO characteristics on safety culture, resiliency, and the organizations' ability to respond to unforeseen events.
高可靠性组织,弹性和安全文化
复杂的安全关键技术系统故障可能对工人和周围社区构成严重威胁。这些组织本质上是复杂的,依赖于最新的技术来生存和正常运作。这些系统中的故障很少见,但非常明显,这使得此类故障的后果是灾难性的。为了生存,技术系统必须能够在系统试图避免的任何不良后果发生之前对操作异常做出响应。随着复杂系统中任务不确定性的增加(通常在“非正常”或紧急情况下),常规操作的异常数量增加,使组织层次结构过载。为了迎接新的挑战,组织必须使用另一种机制来维持自身。总统政策指令(PPD) 21将弹性定义为“准备和适应不断变化的条件,承受并从中断中迅速恢复”的能力。如果不理解人类和组织因素在技术系统中的重要作用,并在意外事件中主动解决/促进它们的相互作用,恢复将是一个美梦,而弹性只会是一个无法实现的海市蜃楼。高可靠性组织(HRO)是一种弹性组织。这些组织是为避免此类事故而设计和管理的高风险组织的一个子集。在本文中,我们研究了人力资源管理特征对安全文化、弹性和组织应对突发事件的能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信