Subjective Security in a Volatile Geopolitical Situation: Does Lithuanian Society Feel Safe?

Eglė Vileikienė, Diana Janušauskienė
{"title":"Subjective Security in a Volatile Geopolitical Situation: Does Lithuanian Society Feel Safe?","authors":"Eglė Vileikienė, Diana Janušauskienė","doi":"10.1515/jobs-2016-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The geopolitical situation of Lithuania has deteriorated since the annexation of Crimea and the military conflict in Eastern Ukraine. It has affected the objective security of the state as well as subjective security of the Lithuanian population. This article analyses subjective security and deals with the subjective perception of geopolitical and military threats, mainly social attitudes towards national security and the willingness to defend the country. Article is based on theories of securitisation and human security and holds that individuals are the primary referents of security. Empirically, the article relies on the original data of the research project “Subjective Security in a Volatile Geopolitical Context: Traits, Factors and Individual Strategies”, funded by the Research Council of Lithuania. Article shows the dynamics of social attitudes towards security. Over the last 15 years, a clear shift towards the understanding of potential military threats has occurred. Nevertheless, the predominant concern about individual security, overshadowing security of the state and security of the global order, found in previous studies, has persisted. An individual, as a rule, feels most secure in his/her “closest” environment, e.g. family and friends, and least secure in the “farthest” environment, e.g. other continents.","PeriodicalId":395627,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Baltic Security","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Baltic Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jobs-2016-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract The geopolitical situation of Lithuania has deteriorated since the annexation of Crimea and the military conflict in Eastern Ukraine. It has affected the objective security of the state as well as subjective security of the Lithuanian population. This article analyses subjective security and deals with the subjective perception of geopolitical and military threats, mainly social attitudes towards national security and the willingness to defend the country. Article is based on theories of securitisation and human security and holds that individuals are the primary referents of security. Empirically, the article relies on the original data of the research project “Subjective Security in a Volatile Geopolitical Context: Traits, Factors and Individual Strategies”, funded by the Research Council of Lithuania. Article shows the dynamics of social attitudes towards security. Over the last 15 years, a clear shift towards the understanding of potential military threats has occurred. Nevertheless, the predominant concern about individual security, overshadowing security of the state and security of the global order, found in previous studies, has persisted. An individual, as a rule, feels most secure in his/her “closest” environment, e.g. family and friends, and least secure in the “farthest” environment, e.g. other continents.
地缘政治动荡中的主观安全:立陶宛社会是否感到安全?
自吞并克里米亚和乌克兰东部军事冲突以来,立陶宛的地缘政治局势不断恶化。它既影响到国家的客观安全,也影响到立陶宛人民的主观安全。本文对主观安全进行了分析,并讨论了对地缘政治和军事威胁的主观感知,主要是社会对国家安全的态度和保卫国家的意愿。文章以证券化理论和人的安全理论为基础,认为个人是安全的主要参照物。在实证方面,本文依赖于立陶宛研究委员会资助的研究项目“动荡地缘政治背景下的主观安全:特征、因素和个人策略”的原始数据。文章展示了社会对安全态度的动态变化。在过去的15年里,对潜在军事威胁的理解发生了明显的转变。然而,先前研究中发现的对个人安全的主要关切仍然存在,这种关切盖过了国家安全和全球秩序的安全。一般来说,个人在“最近”的环境(如家人和朋友)中感到最安全,而在“最远”的环境(如其他大陆)中最不安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信