The acquisition of foreign language vocabulary: Does spacing effect matter?

F. Al-Khasawneh
{"title":"The acquisition of foreign language vocabulary: Does spacing effect matter?","authors":"F. Al-Khasawneh","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2023-3-174-193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Research that investigated effective strategies for learning foreign language vocabulary revealed that long spacing facilitates learning more than short or no spacing. This phenomenon is known as distributed practice effect.Aim. The present study aimed to examine the effect of spaced instruction on vocabulary learning and retention among Saudi EFL learners.Methodology and research methods. The sample of this study includes 30 English major students at King Khalid University. The students were divided into two groups (15 students for the massed instruction group and 15 students for the spaced instruction group). Both groups were taught 20 new words which were selected based on the results of the Vocabulary Size Test by Nation P., Beglar D. In the condition of massed class, the target words were taught in 45-minute weekly session (lasted for two weeks). In the condition of spaced class, 45 minutes were distributed into three 15-minutes session presented throughout the week at intervals with two intervening days between each session (lasted for two weeks). Both groups received a post-test after eight weeks of training, while the delayed post-test was administered three weeks later (week 11).Results. The results of the study revealed that there was statistically significant difference between the massed and spaced instruction groups on both post-test and delayed post-test in favor to the spaced instruction group.Scientific novelty. The present study makes several contributions to the body of literature. First, it adds to the relatively small amount of research on the spacing effect on the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Second, it is one of the very few studies that have been conducted in the Arab world, more specifically in the Saudi context. Finally, the study provides better understanding of the importance of spacing in learning foreign language vocabulary among Arab learners.Practical significance. In the light of the obtained results, several recommendations have been provided for EFL practitioners and curriculum designers. This study suggests that EFL practitioners should consider spaced learning as beneficial teaching strategy, and to synthesise it in the educational materials.","PeriodicalId":278157,"journal":{"name":"The Education and science journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Education and science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-3-174-193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Research that investigated effective strategies for learning foreign language vocabulary revealed that long spacing facilitates learning more than short or no spacing. This phenomenon is known as distributed practice effect.Aim. The present study aimed to examine the effect of spaced instruction on vocabulary learning and retention among Saudi EFL learners.Methodology and research methods. The sample of this study includes 30 English major students at King Khalid University. The students were divided into two groups (15 students for the massed instruction group and 15 students for the spaced instruction group). Both groups were taught 20 new words which were selected based on the results of the Vocabulary Size Test by Nation P., Beglar D. In the condition of massed class, the target words were taught in 45-minute weekly session (lasted for two weeks). In the condition of spaced class, 45 minutes were distributed into three 15-minutes session presented throughout the week at intervals with two intervening days between each session (lasted for two weeks). Both groups received a post-test after eight weeks of training, while the delayed post-test was administered three weeks later (week 11).Results. The results of the study revealed that there was statistically significant difference between the massed and spaced instruction groups on both post-test and delayed post-test in favor to the spaced instruction group.Scientific novelty. The present study makes several contributions to the body of literature. First, it adds to the relatively small amount of research on the spacing effect on the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Second, it is one of the very few studies that have been conducted in the Arab world, more specifically in the Saudi context. Finally, the study provides better understanding of the importance of spacing in learning foreign language vocabulary among Arab learners.Practical significance. In the light of the obtained results, several recommendations have been provided for EFL practitioners and curriculum designers. This study suggests that EFL practitioners should consider spaced learning as beneficial teaching strategy, and to synthesise it in the educational materials.
外语词汇的习得:间隔效应重要吗?
介绍。一项关于学习外语词汇的有效策略的研究表明,长间隔比短间隔或无间隔更有利于学习。这种现象被称为分布式练习效应。本研究旨在探讨间隔教学对沙特英语学习者词汇学习和记忆的影响。方法论和研究方法。本研究的样本包括30名哈立德国王大学英语专业的学生。学生被分为两组(15名学生为集中教学组,15名学生为间隔教学组)。两组分别学习20个新单词,这些单词是根据Nation P, Beglar D.的词汇量测试结果选出的。在集班教学条件下,每周45分钟,持续两周。在间隔上课的情况下,45分钟的时间被分成三个15分钟的时间段,在整个星期内,每次时间段之间有两天的间隔(持续两周)。两组均在训练八周后接受后测,而延迟后测在三周后(第11周)进行。研究结果显示,密集教学组和间隔教学组在后测和延迟后测两方面均有统计学差异,间隔教学组在后测和延迟后测两方面均优于前者。科学的新奇。本研究对文献体系做出了若干贡献。首先,它增加了相对较少的关于间隔对外语词汇习得影响的研究。其次,这是在阿拉伯世界进行的为数不多的研究之一,更具体地说,是在沙特的背景下进行的。最后,该研究使阿拉伯学习者更好地理解间隔在学习外语词汇中的重要性。现实意义。根据所获得的结果,本文为EFL从业者和课程设计者提供了几点建议。本研究建议,英语学习者应考虑将间隔学习作为一种有益的教学策略,并将其综合到教材中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信