Legal Certainty of Digital Assets Non-Fungible Token (NFT) on The Opensea Platform

Ulfanora Ulfanora, Almaududi Almaududi
{"title":"Legal Certainty of Digital Assets Non-Fungible Token (NFT) on The Opensea Platform","authors":"Ulfanora Ulfanora, Almaududi Almaududi","doi":"10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of technology in everyday life has become more sufficient. This technology results in digitalization which gives rise to digital assets that later become crypto assets that use blockchain technology to store data. The development of these crypto assets presents a technology called Non-Fungible Token (NFT) which is a technology linked to a work of art or other digital assets that serves to protect the artwork or digital assets and as proof of ownership. NFT presents a new way for artists to sell their art more safely and avoid harmful actions. However, the widespread use of NFT technology has created a problem due to the lack of legality regarding NFT. The formulation of the problems discussed in this thesis are: 1. What is the legal certainty for digital assets in the form of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) on the Opensea digital platform? 2. What is the legality of Smart Contracts in each transaction of Non-Fungible Token (NFT) through the Opensea digital platform? The research method used is a normative juridical research method, taking a statutory approach and having a descriptive-analytical nature. From the results of this research, can be seen that NFT has not been clearly regulated in Indonesian positive law, resulting in a legal vacuum. Regulations regarding Crypto are regulated by Bappebti as the governing body. Bappebti itself has not specifically regulated NFT regulations in Bappebti regulations. Besides that, other arrangements are seen through the Civil Code which regulates NFT as an intangible object ITE Law which regulates the implementation of the transaction. And regarding the protection of its Intelectual Property Rights through the Copyright Law. Then regarding the validity of the Smart Contract in Non-Fungible Token (NFT) transactions it is considered valid in Indonesian positive law based on the Pacta sunt servanda principle and must be based on the compliance of Article 1320 of the Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":193737,"journal":{"name":"UNES Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNES Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of technology in everyday life has become more sufficient. This technology results in digitalization which gives rise to digital assets that later become crypto assets that use blockchain technology to store data. The development of these crypto assets presents a technology called Non-Fungible Token (NFT) which is a technology linked to a work of art or other digital assets that serves to protect the artwork or digital assets and as proof of ownership. NFT presents a new way for artists to sell their art more safely and avoid harmful actions. However, the widespread use of NFT technology has created a problem due to the lack of legality regarding NFT. The formulation of the problems discussed in this thesis are: 1. What is the legal certainty for digital assets in the form of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) on the Opensea digital platform? 2. What is the legality of Smart Contracts in each transaction of Non-Fungible Token (NFT) through the Opensea digital platform? The research method used is a normative juridical research method, taking a statutory approach and having a descriptive-analytical nature. From the results of this research, can be seen that NFT has not been clearly regulated in Indonesian positive law, resulting in a legal vacuum. Regulations regarding Crypto are regulated by Bappebti as the governing body. Bappebti itself has not specifically regulated NFT regulations in Bappebti regulations. Besides that, other arrangements are seen through the Civil Code which regulates NFT as an intangible object ITE Law which regulates the implementation of the transaction. And regarding the protection of its Intelectual Property Rights through the Copyright Law. Then regarding the validity of the Smart Contract in Non-Fungible Token (NFT) transactions it is considered valid in Indonesian positive law based on the Pacta sunt servanda principle and must be based on the compliance of Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
Opensea平台上数字资产不可替代代币(NFT)的法律确定性
科技在日常生活中的作用已经变得更加充分。这项技术导致了数字化,从而产生了数字资产,这些资产后来成为使用区块链技术存储数据的加密资产。这些加密资产的发展提出了一种称为不可替代令牌(NFT)的技术,这是一种与艺术品或其他数字资产相关联的技术,用于保护艺术品或数字资产并作为所有权证明。NFT为艺术家提供了一种更安全、避免有害行为的新方式。然而,由于对NFT缺乏合法性,NFT技术的广泛使用产生了一个问题。本文所讨论问题的表述为:1。Opensea数字平台上以不可替代代币(NFT)形式的数字资产的法律确定性是什么?2. 通过Opensea数字平台进行的每次不可替代代币(NFT)交易中,智能合约的合法性是什么?本文采用的研究方法是一种规范性的法律研究方法,采用成文法的方法,具有描述性分析的性质。从本研究的结果可以看出,印尼实在法对NFT没有明确的规定,造成了法律真空。有关加密货币的法规由Bappebti作为理事机构进行监管。Bappebti本身并没有在Bappebti法规中具体规定NFT法规。除此之外,其他安排可以通过民法看到,民法将NFT作为一种无形的客体进行管理,而法律则规定了交易的实施。关于著作权法对其知识产权的保护。然后,关于智能合约在不可替代代币(NFT)交易中的有效性,它在印度尼西亚成文法中被认为是有效的,基于“契约必须遵守”原则,必须基于遵守“民法典”第1320条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信