Veterinary care deserts: what is the capacity and where is it?

Sue M. Neal, Michael J. Greenberg
{"title":"Veterinary care deserts: what is the capacity and where is it?","authors":"Sue M. Neal, Michael J. Greenberg","doi":"10.56771/jsmcah.v1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Access to veterinary care is a complex issue that lies at the intersection of socioeconomics, culture, and space. Although there has been substantial research that has explored factors that impede access to care, the issue has not been well addressed from a geographic perspective. Access deserts is a familiar concept that has been applied to human health care, access to nutritious foods, etc. Thus, there is value in conceptualizinsg access to veterinary care through the same lens. This research aims to advance the effort of identifying veterinary care deserts by specifying normative values for two fundamental parameters: the ratio of care providers to measures of the population and the catchment of clinics. Methods: Total employees at veterinary clinics were aggregated at the county level and normalized by different measures of human and companion animal population. All clinic employees are included under the assumption that increased support staff increases the overall care capacity. Weighted means were generated and reported for each approach. The number of veterinary clinic employees needed in each county in order to reach the weighted mean for the overall country is also reported both at the county level and state level. Clinic catchment was measured by evaluating the mean distance traveled using data from a large number of clinics and clinic clients. The data were further analyzed using Rural Urban Commuting Areas (RUCA) classifications. Results: Veterinary employee shortages were observed ranging from 20,000 to 60,000 employees depending on how the data are viewed. Parameters for the weighted mean number of employees were reported in a detailed chart. Results of the distance analysis indicate that most people travel between 2 and 6 miles to reach clinics. Conclusion: This research indicates spatial disparities in the distribution of veterinary staff. The parameters of the ratio of employees to population measures and distance traveled can both be used in future research that aims to identify local and regional veterinary care deserts. This analysis could be further enhanced by the addition of factors such as socioeconomic data or social determinants of health to further define and identify care deserts.","PeriodicalId":128499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56771/jsmcah.v1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Access to veterinary care is a complex issue that lies at the intersection of socioeconomics, culture, and space. Although there has been substantial research that has explored factors that impede access to care, the issue has not been well addressed from a geographic perspective. Access deserts is a familiar concept that has been applied to human health care, access to nutritious foods, etc. Thus, there is value in conceptualizinsg access to veterinary care through the same lens. This research aims to advance the effort of identifying veterinary care deserts by specifying normative values for two fundamental parameters: the ratio of care providers to measures of the population and the catchment of clinics. Methods: Total employees at veterinary clinics were aggregated at the county level and normalized by different measures of human and companion animal population. All clinic employees are included under the assumption that increased support staff increases the overall care capacity. Weighted means were generated and reported for each approach. The number of veterinary clinic employees needed in each county in order to reach the weighted mean for the overall country is also reported both at the county level and state level. Clinic catchment was measured by evaluating the mean distance traveled using data from a large number of clinics and clinic clients. The data were further analyzed using Rural Urban Commuting Areas (RUCA) classifications. Results: Veterinary employee shortages were observed ranging from 20,000 to 60,000 employees depending on how the data are viewed. Parameters for the weighted mean number of employees were reported in a detailed chart. Results of the distance analysis indicate that most people travel between 2 and 6 miles to reach clinics. Conclusion: This research indicates spatial disparities in the distribution of veterinary staff. The parameters of the ratio of employees to population measures and distance traveled can both be used in future research that aims to identify local and regional veterinary care deserts. This analysis could be further enhanced by the addition of factors such as socioeconomic data or social determinants of health to further define and identify care deserts.
兽医护理沙漠:能力是什么,在哪里?
引言:获得兽医护理是一个复杂的问题,它位于社会经济、文化和空间的交叉点。虽然已经进行了大量研究,探讨了阻碍获得保健的因素,但从地理角度来看,这一问题尚未得到很好的解决。获取沙漠是一个熟悉的概念,已应用于人类卫生保健,获取营养食品等。因此,从同样的角度概念化获得兽医护理的机会是有价值的。本研究旨在通过指定两个基本参数的规范性值来推进识别兽医护理沙漠的努力:护理提供者与人口的比例和诊所的集水区。方法:对县级兽医诊所从业人员总数进行统计,并采用不同的人类和伴侣动物种群指标进行归一化。所有的诊所员工都包括在增加支持人员增加整体护理能力的假设下。对每种方法生成并报告加权平均值。为了达到全国的加权平均值,每个县所需的兽医诊所雇员人数也在县一级和州一级报告。通过使用大量诊所和诊所客户的数据评估平均路程来测量诊所集水区。采用城乡通勤区(RUCA)分类对数据进行进一步分析。结果:根据数据的不同,兽医员工的短缺从2万到6万不等。加权平均雇员人数的参数在详细的图表中报告。距离分析的结果表明,大多数人去诊所的路程在2到6英里之间。结论:本研究显示兽医人员分布存在空间差异。雇员与人口的比例和旅行距离的参数都可以用于未来的研究,旨在确定当地和区域兽医护理沙漠。这种分析可以通过增加诸如社会经济数据或健康的社会决定因素等因素进一步加强,以进一步定义和确定护理沙漠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信