Together and Apart

M. Dibattista
{"title":"Together and Apart","authors":"M. Dibattista","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mansfield was dead a week when Virginia Woolf confided in her diary that ‘probably we had something in common which I shall never find in anyone else’. Woolf attributed their rapport to Mansfield’s ‘caring so genuinely if so differently from the way I care about our precious art’. Perhaps only in death could Woolf finally agree to the less equivocal version of their relationship that Mansfield had put to her years before: ‘We have got the same job, Virginia, & it is really very curious & thrilling that we should both, quite apart from each other, be after so very nearly the same thing. We are you know; there’s no denying it.’\nOne can feel no need to deny it and yet still wonder what that ‘something in common’ actually was and why Woolf, given her extensive and varied circle of family and friends, felt so inconsolable upon the loss – not simply the diminishment – of it. This essay is motivated by that wonder. It explores the artistic affinity that brought Mansfield and Woolf together in a unique literary rapport but also insists on the differences – especially in their attitudes towards time as a fulfiller or thwarter of human hopes – that ultimately set them apart in their representations of ‘Life’.","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mansfield was dead a week when Virginia Woolf confided in her diary that ‘probably we had something in common which I shall never find in anyone else’. Woolf attributed their rapport to Mansfield’s ‘caring so genuinely if so differently from the way I care about our precious art’. Perhaps only in death could Woolf finally agree to the less equivocal version of their relationship that Mansfield had put to her years before: ‘We have got the same job, Virginia, & it is really very curious & thrilling that we should both, quite apart from each other, be after so very nearly the same thing. We are you know; there’s no denying it.’ One can feel no need to deny it and yet still wonder what that ‘something in common’ actually was and why Woolf, given her extensive and varied circle of family and friends, felt so inconsolable upon the loss – not simply the diminishment – of it. This essay is motivated by that wonder. It explores the artistic affinity that brought Mansfield and Woolf together in a unique literary rapport but also insists on the differences – especially in their attitudes towards time as a fulfiller or thwarter of human hopes – that ultimately set them apart in their representations of ‘Life’.
在一起和分开
曼斯菲尔德去世一周后,弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫在她的日记中吐露道:“也许我们有一些我在其他人身上找不到的共同点。”伍尔夫将他们的融洽关系归功于曼斯菲尔德“如此真诚地关心我们珍贵的艺术,尽管这与我关心我们珍贵艺术的方式如此不同”。也许只有在死后,伍尔夫才最终同意曼斯菲尔德多年前对她说过的那种不那么模棱两可的关系:“我们有同样的工作,弗吉尼亚,我们俩虽然彼此不同,但追求的却几乎是同样的事情,这真的是非常奇怪和令人兴奋的。”我们是你知道的;不可否认的是。人们没有必要否认这一点,但仍然想知道“共同点”到底是什么,为什么伍尔夫,考虑到她广泛而多样的家庭和朋友圈子,对失去——而不仅仅是减少——感到如此难以安慰。这篇文章的动机就是这个奇迹。这本书探讨了曼斯菲尔德和伍尔夫在艺术上的亲和力,这种亲和力使他们在独特的文学关系中走到了一起,但也坚持了他们的差异——尤其是他们对时间作为人类希望的实现者或挫败者的态度——最终使他们在“生活”的表现中脱颖而出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信