Comparison of Risks, Returns and Performance Measurements of Sharia and Non-Sharia Mutual Funds in Indonesia

Y. Prasetyo, M. Athoillah, Deni Kamaludin Yusup
{"title":"Comparison of Risks, Returns and Performance Measurements of Sharia and Non-Sharia Mutual Funds in Indonesia","authors":"Y. Prasetyo, M. Athoillah, Deni Kamaludin Yusup","doi":"10.24090/ijtimaiyya.v4i2.3072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment is a sacrifice to postpone current consumption by allocating a number of assets that are expected to earn benefits in the future. Islamic Sharia does not forbid Muslims to do it, even there is an indication that it is recommended. The main motivation is to be able to pay more alms in the future. One of investment instruments in Indonesia is Mutual Funds. Indonesia's predominantly Muslim population is one of the triggers for the development of sharia-based mutual funds. However, its development has not been as big as the existing potential market. One of the reasons is there is still a view in the community that sharia-based instruments provide lower returns than non-sharia. This study compares the risks and returns of mutual funds, between sharia and non-sharia based. Sampling of both used purposive sampling, where there were 6 sharia mutual funds and 8 non-sharia mutual funds. The study was conducted in 5 years. The results of the study were: (1) There was no significant difference between the risks of both; (2) There was no significant difference between the returns of both; (3) The performance of non-sharia mutual funds was more dominating than sharia mutual funds.","PeriodicalId":192303,"journal":{"name":"Ijtimā'iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ijtimā'iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/ijtimaiyya.v4i2.3072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Investment is a sacrifice to postpone current consumption by allocating a number of assets that are expected to earn benefits in the future. Islamic Sharia does not forbid Muslims to do it, even there is an indication that it is recommended. The main motivation is to be able to pay more alms in the future. One of investment instruments in Indonesia is Mutual Funds. Indonesia's predominantly Muslim population is one of the triggers for the development of sharia-based mutual funds. However, its development has not been as big as the existing potential market. One of the reasons is there is still a view in the community that sharia-based instruments provide lower returns than non-sharia. This study compares the risks and returns of mutual funds, between sharia and non-sharia based. Sampling of both used purposive sampling, where there were 6 sharia mutual funds and 8 non-sharia mutual funds. The study was conducted in 5 years. The results of the study were: (1) There was no significant difference between the risks of both; (2) There was no significant difference between the returns of both; (3) The performance of non-sharia mutual funds was more dominating than sharia mutual funds.
印尼伊斯兰教和非伊斯兰教共同基金的风险、回报和绩效衡量比较
投资是一种牺牲,通过分配一些预计在未来获得收益的资产来推迟当前的消费。伊斯兰教法并没有禁止穆斯林这样做,即使有迹象表明这是被推荐的。主要的动机是将来能够支付更多的施舍。印尼的投资工具之一是共同基金。印尼以穆斯林为主的人口是伊斯兰教共同基金发展的诱因之一。然而,它的发展还没有现有的潜在市场那么大。其中一个原因是,社会上仍然有一种观点认为,基于伊斯兰教法的投资工具提供的回报低于非伊斯兰教法的投资工具。本研究比较了伊斯兰教和非伊斯兰教共同基金的风险和回报。抽样都采用了目的性抽样,其中有6个伊斯兰教共同基金和8个非伊斯兰教共同基金。该研究历时5年。研究结果表明:(1)两者的风险无显著性差异;(2)两者的收益无显著差异;(3)非伊斯兰教共同基金的表现比伊斯兰教共同基金更占优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信