Open Tray Impression Technique Using the Direct Pick-Up Coping: A Case Report

Debbabi Imen, Harzallah Belhassen, Ben khelifa Mohamed, C. Mounir
{"title":"Open Tray Impression Technique Using the Direct Pick-Up Coping: A Case Report","authors":"Debbabi Imen, Harzallah Belhassen, Ben khelifa Mohamed, C. Mounir","doi":"10.32474/madohc.2018.03.000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of implant-supported restorations relies on how well the hard and soft tissue information is transferred to the laboratory [1,2]. The critical aspect is to record the threedimensional orientation of the implant as it is present intraorally, other than reproducing fine surface detail for successful implant prosthodontic treatment [3-5]. The development of impression techniques to accurately record implant position has become more complicated and challenging. Several impression techniques have been suggested to obtain a master cast that will ensure the passive fit of prosthesis on implants [6]. In implant dentistry, the two traditional ways of making an impression are the closed tray and the open tray technique. Both impression techniques have their advantages and disadvantages [7]. A recent systematic review revealed that the open tray impression technique is more accurate than the closed tray impression technique [8,9]. It has been shown that the pickup type impression coping is the more accurate type of impression as errors occur on removal and replacement of the transfer type impression copings, especially in the occluso-gingival direction [10,11].","PeriodicalId":202100,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dentistry & Oral Health","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dentistry & Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32474/madohc.2018.03.000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The success of implant-supported restorations relies on how well the hard and soft tissue information is transferred to the laboratory [1,2]. The critical aspect is to record the threedimensional orientation of the implant as it is present intraorally, other than reproducing fine surface detail for successful implant prosthodontic treatment [3-5]. The development of impression techniques to accurately record implant position has become more complicated and challenging. Several impression techniques have been suggested to obtain a master cast that will ensure the passive fit of prosthesis on implants [6]. In implant dentistry, the two traditional ways of making an impression are the closed tray and the open tray technique. Both impression techniques have their advantages and disadvantages [7]. A recent systematic review revealed that the open tray impression technique is more accurate than the closed tray impression technique [8,9]. It has been shown that the pickup type impression coping is the more accurate type of impression as errors occur on removal and replacement of the transfer type impression copings, especially in the occluso-gingival direction [10,11].
直接取顶的开盘印模技术一例报告
种植体支持修复的成功依赖于硬组织和软组织信息传递到实验室的程度[1,2]。对于成功的种植体修复治疗来说,关键的方面是记录种植体在口腔内的三维方向,而不是再现良好的表面细节[3-5]。准确记录种植体位置的压印技术的发展变得更加复杂和具有挑战性。已有几种印模技术被建议用于获得主铸型,以确保假体与植入物的被动配合[6]。在种植牙科中,两种传统的印模方法是封闭托盘和开放托盘技术。两种印象技术各有优缺点[7]。最近的一项系统综述显示,开放式托盘压印技术比封闭式托盘压印技术更准确[8,9]。已有研究表明,当转移型印模顶在移除和替换时,尤其是在咬合-牙龈方向上,会出现误差时,拾取型印模顶是更准确的印模类型[10,11]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信