Safety, Media Coverage and Provincial SOEs: Explaining Ownership Variation in Chinese Coal-Industry Restructuring

Nicholas Martin
{"title":"Safety, Media Coverage and Provincial SOEs: Explaining Ownership Variation in Chinese Coal-Industry Restructuring","authors":"Nicholas Martin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2351473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at regional variation in industrial restructuring and ownership change in China’s coal industry. A growing literature exists on Chinese industrial policy, state efforts to carry out industrial restructuring, and “Chinese state capitalism”. Coal mining presents an interesting case for this research agenda. Contrary to what the literature would suggest, the industry has undergone extensive and from the Center’s perspective, successful, state-led restructuring and has also seen large-scale changes to ownership structures, at least in some provinces. I argue that three variables are key to explaining these changes. Two – geology and path-dependent legacies qua presence or absence of provincial-owned SOEs – are unsurprising. The third – political pressure over mining accidents and the Chinese media’s role in generating this pressure – is unexpected. Restructuring only happened after extensive media coverage of mining accidents converted the industry’s structural problems from a technical, industrial-policy problem into a political problem of wider significance, and restructuring went furthest and ownership changes were most drastic and conflictual where media coverage of accidents and thus political pressure thereover was greatest. In the rest of this paper I first look at the question of restructuring and private ownership in China’s strategic industries. Secondly, I lay out the structural changes coal mining underwent in the past 20 years and lay out the provincial variation. Third, I discuss the interests of local (subprovincial) governments that have led them to take a fairly protective stance towards the private mines. Fourth, I explain how media pressure over accidents reshaped these interests in the 2000s. Fifth, I lay out how these pressures and interests led to varying restructuring patterns in different provinces.","PeriodicalId":289975,"journal":{"name":"MIT Political Science Department Research Paper Series","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIT Political Science Department Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper looks at regional variation in industrial restructuring and ownership change in China’s coal industry. A growing literature exists on Chinese industrial policy, state efforts to carry out industrial restructuring, and “Chinese state capitalism”. Coal mining presents an interesting case for this research agenda. Contrary to what the literature would suggest, the industry has undergone extensive and from the Center’s perspective, successful, state-led restructuring and has also seen large-scale changes to ownership structures, at least in some provinces. I argue that three variables are key to explaining these changes. Two – geology and path-dependent legacies qua presence or absence of provincial-owned SOEs – are unsurprising. The third – political pressure over mining accidents and the Chinese media’s role in generating this pressure – is unexpected. Restructuring only happened after extensive media coverage of mining accidents converted the industry’s structural problems from a technical, industrial-policy problem into a political problem of wider significance, and restructuring went furthest and ownership changes were most drastic and conflictual where media coverage of accidents and thus political pressure thereover was greatest. In the rest of this paper I first look at the question of restructuring and private ownership in China’s strategic industries. Secondly, I lay out the structural changes coal mining underwent in the past 20 years and lay out the provincial variation. Third, I discuss the interests of local (subprovincial) governments that have led them to take a fairly protective stance towards the private mines. Fourth, I explain how media pressure over accidents reshaped these interests in the 2000s. Fifth, I lay out how these pressures and interests led to varying restructuring patterns in different provinces.
安全、媒体报道与省级国有企业:解释中国煤炭产业结构调整中的所有制变动
本文研究了中国煤炭产业结构调整和所有制变动的区域差异。关于中国产业政策、国家进行产业结构调整的努力以及“中国国家资本主义”的文献越来越多。煤矿开采为这一研究议程提供了一个有趣的案例。与文献所显示的相反,该行业经历了广泛的、从中心的角度来看是成功的、由国家主导的重组,并且至少在一些省份,所有权结构也发生了大规模的变化。我认为有三个变量是解释这些变化的关键。其中两点——地质和路径相关的遗留问题——即省级国有企业的存在与否——并不令人意外。第三点——矿难引发的政治压力以及中国媒体在产生这种压力中的作用——出人意料。只有在媒体对矿业事故的广泛报道将行业结构问题从技术、产业政策问题转变为具有更广泛意义的政治问题之后,重组才会发生。在媒体对事故的报道和由此带来的政治压力最大的地方,重组走得最远,所有权变化最剧烈,冲突也最激烈。在本文的其余部分,我将首先探讨中国战略性产业的重组和私有制问题。其次,对近20年来煤炭开采的结构变化进行了梳理,并对各省的变化进行了梳理。第三,我讨论了地方(副省级)政府的利益,导致他们对私人矿山采取相当保护的立场。第四,我解释了媒体对事故的压力如何在本世纪头十年重塑了这些利益。第五,我列举了这些压力和利益是如何导致不同省份不同的结构调整模式的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信