Adherence to Respiratory Supports in OSA and COPD

M. R. Tumolo, C. Leo, S. Sabina, Giuseppe Ponzini, Eugenio Sabato, P. Mincarone
{"title":"Adherence to Respiratory Supports in OSA and COPD","authors":"M. R. Tumolo, C. Leo, S. Sabina, Giuseppe Ponzini, Eugenio Sabato, P. Mincarone","doi":"10.12974/2312-5470.2021.07.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic respiratory diseases constitute a serious public health problem in all countries, and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are two of the most prevalent. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is recommended for ongoing treatment of OSA in adults while Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is indicated for stable COPD patients with Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency. In real contexts, the clinical efficacy of these therapies is limited by an often-low adherence with consequent rising back of symptoms and adverse consequences on the quality of life. Until now, several driving factors have been identified for a low adherence to CPAP and LTOT and several solutions are proposed in many papers. In this review we identify and discuss the driving factors reported for a low adherence (addressing personal conditions, social context and specificities of the device) and the strategies adopted to mitigate them (behavioral, educational and supportive interventions) and to monitor actual compliance (self-reporting, eHealth solutions and consumptions of device accessories). An overall picture of these aspects allows planning the healthcare service and adequate support for OSA and COPD patients with an attention to the individual, social and cultural level. Further investigation is still needed to explore the value of combinations of the reported approaches on different patient phenotypes and at what cost. ","PeriodicalId":245488,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Respiratory Care","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Respiratory Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2312-5470.2021.07.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic respiratory diseases constitute a serious public health problem in all countries, and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are two of the most prevalent. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is recommended for ongoing treatment of OSA in adults while Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is indicated for stable COPD patients with Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency. In real contexts, the clinical efficacy of these therapies is limited by an often-low adherence with consequent rising back of symptoms and adverse consequences on the quality of life. Until now, several driving factors have been identified for a low adherence to CPAP and LTOT and several solutions are proposed in many papers. In this review we identify and discuss the driving factors reported for a low adherence (addressing personal conditions, social context and specificities of the device) and the strategies adopted to mitigate them (behavioral, educational and supportive interventions) and to monitor actual compliance (self-reporting, eHealth solutions and consumptions of device accessories). An overall picture of these aspects allows planning the healthcare service and adequate support for OSA and COPD patients with an attention to the individual, social and cultural level. Further investigation is still needed to explore the value of combinations of the reported approaches on different patient phenotypes and at what cost. 
OSA和COPD患者对呼吸支持的依从性
慢性呼吸系统疾病在所有国家都是一个严重的公共卫生问题,慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是最普遍的两种疾病。气道正压通气(PAP)被推荐用于成人OSA的持续治疗,而长期氧疗(LTOT)适用于稳定的COPD合并慢性呼吸功能不全患者。在实际情况下,这些疗法的临床疗效往往受到依从性低的限制,随之而来的是症状的复发和对生活质量的不良后果。到目前为止,已经确定了导致CPAP和ltt依从性低的几个驱动因素,并在许多论文中提出了几种解决方案。在这篇综述中,我们确定并讨论了低依从性的驱动因素(解决个人条件、社会背景和设备的特殊性),以及采取的缓解这些因素的策略(行为、教育和支持性干预)和监测实际依从性(自我报告、电子健康解决方案和设备配件的消耗)。这些方面的整体情况允许规划医疗保健服务和充分支持OSA和COPD患者,并关注个人,社会和文化层面。还需要进一步的研究来探索所报道的方法对不同患者表型的组合价值和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信