Visualizing Narrative: Lutheran Theology in the Engravings of Lucas Cranach

P. Kotliarov, Vyacheslav Vyacheslav
{"title":"Visualizing Narrative: Lutheran Theology in the Engravings of Lucas Cranach","authors":"P. Kotliarov, Vyacheslav Vyacheslav","doi":"10.24144/2523-4498.2(45).2021.247097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early stage of the Reformation in Germany was marked by an iconoclastic movement inspired by radical reformers. In the scientific literature, iconoclasm is often interpreted as a phenomenon that became a catastrophe for German art, as it halted its renaissance progress. The purpose of the article is to prove that the Lutheran Reformation did not become an event that stopped the development of German art, but, on the contrary, gave a new impetus to its development, especially the art of engraving. Throughout the history of Christianity, there have been discussions about what church art should be, in what form it should exist and what function it should carry. In the days of the Reformation, these discussions flared up with renewed vigor. Most reformers held the view that the church needed to be cleansed of works of art that were seen as a legacy of Catholicism. The iconoclast movement that transitioned into church pogroms and the destruction of works of art in Wittenberg in early 1522 prompted Martin Luther to publicly express his disagreement with the radical reformers and to express his own position on the fine arts in the reformed church. In a series of sermons from March 9 to 16, 1522 (Invocavit), Martin Luther recommended the destruction of images that became objects of worship, but considered it appropriate to leave works of art that illustrate biblical stories or reformation ideas. For Luther, the didactic significance of images became a decisive argument. The main points of the series of Luther’s sermons (Invocavit) show that he not only condemned the vandalism of iconoclasts, but also argued that the presence of works of art in the church does not contradict the Bible, but, on the contrary, helps to better understand important truths. It is noted that the result of Luther's tolerant position was the edition of the September Bible (1522) illustrated by Lucas Cranach's engravings. The reviewed narrative and visual sources prove that due to Reformation the art of engraving received a new impetus, and Lutheranism was formed not only as a church of the culture of the word, but also of the culture of the eye. It was established that the main requirement for art was strict adherence to the narrative, which is observed in the analyzed engravings of Lucas Cranach. It is considered that the engravings to the book of Revelation are characterized not only by the accuracy of the text, but also by sharpened polemics, adding a new sound to biblical symbols, sharp criticism of the Catholic Church, and visualization of the main enemies of the Reformed Church. It is proved that the polemical orientation of the engravings spurred interest and contributed to the commercial success of the September Bible. The rejection of traditional plots by protestant artists did not become overly destructive, and in some cases, it even led to the enrichment of European visual culture.","PeriodicalId":390649,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.2(45).2021.247097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The early stage of the Reformation in Germany was marked by an iconoclastic movement inspired by radical reformers. In the scientific literature, iconoclasm is often interpreted as a phenomenon that became a catastrophe for German art, as it halted its renaissance progress. The purpose of the article is to prove that the Lutheran Reformation did not become an event that stopped the development of German art, but, on the contrary, gave a new impetus to its development, especially the art of engraving. Throughout the history of Christianity, there have been discussions about what church art should be, in what form it should exist and what function it should carry. In the days of the Reformation, these discussions flared up with renewed vigor. Most reformers held the view that the church needed to be cleansed of works of art that were seen as a legacy of Catholicism. The iconoclast movement that transitioned into church pogroms and the destruction of works of art in Wittenberg in early 1522 prompted Martin Luther to publicly express his disagreement with the radical reformers and to express his own position on the fine arts in the reformed church. In a series of sermons from March 9 to 16, 1522 (Invocavit), Martin Luther recommended the destruction of images that became objects of worship, but considered it appropriate to leave works of art that illustrate biblical stories or reformation ideas. For Luther, the didactic significance of images became a decisive argument. The main points of the series of Luther’s sermons (Invocavit) show that he not only condemned the vandalism of iconoclasts, but also argued that the presence of works of art in the church does not contradict the Bible, but, on the contrary, helps to better understand important truths. It is noted that the result of Luther's tolerant position was the edition of the September Bible (1522) illustrated by Lucas Cranach's engravings. The reviewed narrative and visual sources prove that due to Reformation the art of engraving received a new impetus, and Lutheranism was formed not only as a church of the culture of the word, but also of the culture of the eye. It was established that the main requirement for art was strict adherence to the narrative, which is observed in the analyzed engravings of Lucas Cranach. It is considered that the engravings to the book of Revelation are characterized not only by the accuracy of the text, but also by sharpened polemics, adding a new sound to biblical symbols, sharp criticism of the Catholic Church, and visualization of the main enemies of the Reformed Church. It is proved that the polemical orientation of the engravings spurred interest and contributed to the commercial success of the September Bible. The rejection of traditional plots by protestant artists did not become overly destructive, and in some cases, it even led to the enrichment of European visual culture.
可视化叙事:卢卡斯·克拉纳赫版画中的路德神学
德国宗教改革的早期阶段以激进改革者激发的反传统运动为标志。在科学文献中,偶像破坏主义经常被解释为一种现象,它成为德国艺术的一场灾难,因为它阻止了德国艺术的复兴进程。这篇文章的目的是证明路德宗教改革并没有成为阻止德国艺术发展的事件,相反,它给了它的发展新的动力,尤其是雕刻艺术。纵观基督教历史,关于教会艺术应该是什么,应该以什么样的形式存在,应该承担什么样的功能,人们一直在讨论。在宗教改革的日子里,这些讨论重新活跃起来。大多数改革者认为,教堂需要清除被视为天主教遗产的艺术品。1522年初,反传统运动演变为教堂大屠杀和维滕贝格艺术品的破坏,这促使马丁·路德公开表达了他对激进改革者的不同意见,并表达了他对改革宗教会美术的立场。在1522年3月9日至16日的一系列布道中(Invocavit),马丁·路德建议销毁成为崇拜对象的图像,但认为保留说明圣经故事或改革思想的艺术作品是合适的。对路德来说,图像的说教意义成为一个决定性的论点。路德的一系列布道(Invocavit)的要点表明,他不仅谴责破坏圣像者的破坏行为,而且还认为,在教堂里出现艺术作品并不违背圣经,相反,有助于更好地理解重要的真理。值得注意的是,路德宽容立场的结果是由卢卡斯·克拉纳赫(Lucas Cranach)雕刻的九月版圣经(1522年)。经过审查的叙述和视觉来源证明,由于宗教改革,雕刻艺术获得了新的推动力,路德教不仅形成了一个文字文化的教会,而且形成了一个视觉文化的教会。人们确定,对艺术的主要要求是严格遵守叙事,这在卢卡斯·克拉纳赫(Lucas Cranach)的分析版画中可以观察到。人们认为,《启示录》的雕刻不仅以文本的准确性为特点,而且以尖锐的辩论为特点,为圣经符号增加了新的声音,对天主教会进行了尖锐的批评,并将改革宗教会的主要敌人形象化。事实证明,这些版画的论战性取向激发了人们的兴趣,并为《九月圣经》的商业成功做出了贡献。新教艺术家对传统情节的拒绝并没有变得过于具有破坏性,在某些情况下,它甚至导致了欧洲视觉文化的丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信