On de facto moral friends and a two-level, multimodal account of moral considerability: A critique of Metzian relationalism

Wandile Ganya
{"title":"On de facto moral friends and a two-level, multimodal account of moral considerability: A critique of Metzian relationalism","authors":"Wandile Ganya","doi":"10.4314/ajct.v3i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to ground an argument for a widened scope in regard to the motivations or reasons accounting for moral  considerability. Such a scope, it is here argued, would account not only for human persons but animals, ecosystems, hypothetical artificial  moral agents and so-called Martians as well. And it does so by first distinguishing between two categories of entities: members  of group X, and entities not of group X. This basic distinction is then employed to articulate the groundwork for a two-level, multimodal  account of moral considerability and gives signification to the idea of de facto moral friends. To achieve this, it appropriates much of its  central tenets from the affluence of African philosophical, and intellectual heritage, on this occasion, the notion of Ubuntu. Lastly, this  paper assumes the viewpoint of metaethical X-centrism, alternatively, metaethical anthropocentrism in constructing moral claims  ","PeriodicalId":141056,"journal":{"name":"Arụmarụka: Journal of Conversational Thinking","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arụmarụka: Journal of Conversational Thinking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajct.v3i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to ground an argument for a widened scope in regard to the motivations or reasons accounting for moral  considerability. Such a scope, it is here argued, would account not only for human persons but animals, ecosystems, hypothetical artificial  moral agents and so-called Martians as well. And it does so by first distinguishing between two categories of entities: members  of group X, and entities not of group X. This basic distinction is then employed to articulate the groundwork for a two-level, multimodal  account of moral considerability and gives signification to the idea of de facto moral friends. To achieve this, it appropriates much of its  central tenets from the affluence of African philosophical, and intellectual heritage, on this occasion, the notion of Ubuntu. Lastly, this  paper assumes the viewpoint of metaethical X-centrism, alternatively, metaethical anthropocentrism in constructing moral claims  
论事实上的道德朋友和道德可观性的两层次、多模态解释:对梅兹关系主义的批判
本文旨在为更广泛的范围内关于道德可观性的动机或原因的论点奠定基础。作者认为,这样的范围不仅适用于人类,也适用于动物、生态系统、假想的人工道德行为者和所谓的火星人。它首先区分两类实体:群体X的成员,和不属于群体X的实体,这一基本区分随后被用来阐明道德可观性的两层,多模态解释的基础,并赋予事实上的道德朋友的概念意义。为了实现这一目标,它从丰富的非洲哲学和知识遗产中汲取了许多核心原则,在这种情况下,就是乌班图的概念。最后,本文假设了元伦理的x中心主义观点,或者元伦理的人类中心主义观点来构建道德主张
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信