Who Does Not Vote and Why? Implication for New Democracies

E. B. Tambe
{"title":"Who Does Not Vote and Why? Implication for New Democracies","authors":"E. B. Tambe","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.80988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the attention of scholars already drawn to the decline in voter turnout in new democracies after the first wave of open/competitive elections, by relying on aggregate data studies have provided explanations for cross-national variations in turnout. Yet, the reliance on aggregate data makes it hard to establish what had lead individuals to abstain from the political process. Thus, in this chapter, by using individual-level analysis from the European Social Survey and the Afrobarometer we re-interrogate the determinants of non-voting in two new democracies of post-Communist Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. Having tested the various explanations for non-voting, first, our results show some consistency across the two regions, suggesting non-voters are those who lack any form of psychological engagement with politics, who are isolated from the recruitment networks and live in urban areas. Second, our result tends to be contradictory, in which while in post-Communist Europe non-voters are men and those with lower level of education in sub-Saharan Africa they are women and those with higher level of education. Third, pertaining to country level indicators, apart from the fact non-voters in both regions are those who have no trust in elections and who lived in countries with disproportional electoral systems, the results tend to be varied.","PeriodicalId":127050,"journal":{"name":"Elections - A Global Perspective","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elections - A Global Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.80988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the attention of scholars already drawn to the decline in voter turnout in new democracies after the first wave of open/competitive elections, by relying on aggregate data studies have provided explanations for cross-national variations in turnout. Yet, the reliance on aggregate data makes it hard to establish what had lead individuals to abstain from the political process. Thus, in this chapter, by using individual-level analysis from the European Social Survey and the Afrobarometer we re-interrogate the determinants of non-voting in two new democracies of post-Communist Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. Having tested the various explanations for non-voting, first, our results show some consistency across the two regions, suggesting non-voters are those who lack any form of psychological engagement with politics, who are isolated from the recruitment networks and live in urban areas. Second, our result tends to be contradictory, in which while in post-Communist Europe non-voters are men and those with lower level of education in sub-Saharan Africa they are women and those with higher level of education. Third, pertaining to country level indicators, apart from the fact non-voters in both regions are those who have no trust in elections and who lived in countries with disproportional electoral systems, the results tend to be varied.
谁不投票,为什么不投票?对新民主国家的启示
随着学者们对第一波公开/竞争性选举后新民主国家选民投票率下降的关注,依靠汇总数据的研究已经为投票率的跨国变化提供了解释。然而,对汇总数据的依赖使得很难确定导致个人放弃政治进程的原因。因此,在本章中,通过使用来自欧洲社会调查和非洲晴雨表的个人层面分析,我们重新审视了后共产主义欧洲和撒哈拉以南非洲两个新民主国家不投票的决定因素。在测试了不投票的各种解释之后,首先,我们的结果显示了两个地区之间的一些一致性,表明不投票的人是那些与政治缺乏任何形式的心理接触的人,他们与招募网络隔绝,生活在城市地区。其次,我们的结果往往是矛盾的,在后共产主义欧洲,不投票的是男性和受教育程度较低的人,而在撒哈拉以南非洲,不投票的是女性和受教育程度较高的人。第三,关于国家一级的指标,除了这两个区域的非选民是那些不信任选举和生活在选举制度不成比例的国家的人这一事实外,结果往往是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信