Governing the Purpose of Investment Management: How the ‘Stewardship’ Norm is being (Re)Developed in the UK and EU

I. Chiu
{"title":"Governing the Purpose of Investment Management: How the ‘Stewardship’ Norm is being (Re)Developed in the UK and EU","authors":"I. Chiu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3908561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the introduction of shareholder engagement as a ‘norm’ for stewardship, the regulatory governance of investment management conduct has been ramping up. As investment funds and asset managers assume control of increasing global assets under management and enjoy significant allocative power, public interest in the exercise of such power increases correspondingly. It is inevitable that societal and public expectations would be augmented and the governance needs for the industry would rise. This article argues that the UK Stewardship Code 2020 is a ‘graduation’ from an earlier experimental period which focused on the narrower and process-based ‘norm’ of shareholder engagement. The Code has broken new ground by articulating purpose-based steers for investment management, providing the starting point for a type of governance that may come to define the regulation of investment management in the future. Indeed, sustainable finance reforms such as in the EU and UK may provide the crucial kickstart to introducing non-optional integration of sustainability risks and goals into mainstream investment management in due course. Purpose-based governance, albeit in its soft law beginnings, is arguably a new trajectory for calibrating the relationship between private investment management and regulation, reflecting the public interest and expectations for the future of the industry.","PeriodicalId":440326,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Law eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3908561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

From the introduction of shareholder engagement as a ‘norm’ for stewardship, the regulatory governance of investment management conduct has been ramping up. As investment funds and asset managers assume control of increasing global assets under management and enjoy significant allocative power, public interest in the exercise of such power increases correspondingly. It is inevitable that societal and public expectations would be augmented and the governance needs for the industry would rise. This article argues that the UK Stewardship Code 2020 is a ‘graduation’ from an earlier experimental period which focused on the narrower and process-based ‘norm’ of shareholder engagement. The Code has broken new ground by articulating purpose-based steers for investment management, providing the starting point for a type of governance that may come to define the regulation of investment management in the future. Indeed, sustainable finance reforms such as in the EU and UK may provide the crucial kickstart to introducing non-optional integration of sustainability risks and goals into mainstream investment management in due course. Purpose-based governance, albeit in its soft law beginnings, is arguably a new trajectory for calibrating the relationship between private investment management and regulation, reflecting the public interest and expectations for the future of the industry.
管理投资管理的目的:英国和欧盟的“管理”规范是如何(重新)发展的
从引入股东参与作为管理的“规范”开始,投资管理行为的监管治理一直在加强。随着投资基金和资产管理公司控制着越来越多的全球管理资产,并享有巨大的配置权力,公众对这种权力行使的兴趣也相应增加。社会和公众的期望将不可避免地提高,行业的治理需求也将上升。本文认为,英国《2020年管理守则》是早期实验阶段的“毕业”,该阶段侧重于更狭隘的、基于流程的股东参与“规范”。该准则通过阐明投资管理的基于目的的指导方针,开辟了新的领域,为一种可能在未来定义投资管理法规的治理类型提供了起点。事实上,欧盟和英国等国的可持续金融改革,可能为在适当时候将可持续性风险和目标纳入主流投资管理提供关键的启动。基于目的的治理,尽管是软法律的开端,但可以说是校准私人投资管理与监管之间关系的新轨迹,反映了公众利益和对该行业未来的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信