Introduction to the special issue Local Development for Peace and Social Sustainability

Graciela H. Tonon
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue Local Development for Peace and Social Sustainability","authors":"Graciela H. Tonon","doi":"10.1080/26883597.2021.2023440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The special issue Local Development for Peace and Social Sustainability is focused on the complex relationship between these three concepts, at various levels, taking into account the point of view of the United Nations on Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights. The main objective of the Special Issue is to present articles – empirical, theoretical, policy-essays and cases – applying two research methods: quantitative and qualitative. The fact that the articles have been written by authors – academics, researchers – from different parts of the planet, Latin America, Europe, and Asia, allows for a more global perspective, by exhibiting the different social, cultural, and political diversities of social sustainability and peace for local development. It also takes into account the situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this aim, we shall begin by making a theoretical review of these three concepts from a multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective, respecting the diversity of the different contexts. During the last 30 years of the Twentieth Century, the discussion of sustainable development was focused on the need to secure a more wholesome natural environment for future generations; yet, it was at the end of the XX century that the international community began to acknowledge the fact that – apart from environmental protection – the central aim had to be the enhancement of human capabilities, together with the improvement of the population’s quality of life. Human development, understood as an equitable and permanent improvement of human quality, was regarded as an end in itself – for the advance of human development, would ensure a more wholesome relationship with the external environment (Anand & Sen, 2000). Biggeri and Ferrannini (2014) define development as multidimensional, multilevel, and dynamic processes, involving multistakeholder as well as multiple local and extra-local relations; for every local development strategy particularly calls for dialogue, consensus of all the political actors, collaboration from different levels of public administration, as well as from the joint work of public and private sectors (Di Pietro Paolo, 2003). It is crucial to acknowledge that local development does not simply depend on local efforts; effective development trajectories can be pursued only if various levels are involved and aligned toward the achievement of common goals (Biggeri & Ferrannini, 2014).","PeriodicalId":208905,"journal":{"name":"Local Development & Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Development & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2021.2023440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The special issue Local Development for Peace and Social Sustainability is focused on the complex relationship between these three concepts, at various levels, taking into account the point of view of the United Nations on Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights. The main objective of the Special Issue is to present articles – empirical, theoretical, policy-essays and cases – applying two research methods: quantitative and qualitative. The fact that the articles have been written by authors – academics, researchers – from different parts of the planet, Latin America, Europe, and Asia, allows for a more global perspective, by exhibiting the different social, cultural, and political diversities of social sustainability and peace for local development. It also takes into account the situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this aim, we shall begin by making a theoretical review of these three concepts from a multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective, respecting the diversity of the different contexts. During the last 30 years of the Twentieth Century, the discussion of sustainable development was focused on the need to secure a more wholesome natural environment for future generations; yet, it was at the end of the XX century that the international community began to acknowledge the fact that – apart from environmental protection – the central aim had to be the enhancement of human capabilities, together with the improvement of the population’s quality of life. Human development, understood as an equitable and permanent improvement of human quality, was regarded as an end in itself – for the advance of human development, would ensure a more wholesome relationship with the external environment (Anand & Sen, 2000). Biggeri and Ferrannini (2014) define development as multidimensional, multilevel, and dynamic processes, involving multistakeholder as well as multiple local and extra-local relations; for every local development strategy particularly calls for dialogue, consensus of all the political actors, collaboration from different levels of public administration, as well as from the joint work of public and private sectors (Di Pietro Paolo, 2003). It is crucial to acknowledge that local development does not simply depend on local efforts; effective development trajectories can be pursued only if various levels are involved and aligned toward the achievement of common goals (Biggeri & Ferrannini, 2014).
特刊《地方发展促进和平与社会可持续性》导言
特刊《地方发展促进和平与社会可持续性》在考虑到联合国关于可持续发展目标和人权的观点的情况下,在不同层面上关注这三个概念之间的复杂关系。特刊的主要目的是介绍文章-实证,理论,政策论文和案例-应用两种研究方法:定量和定性。这些文章都是由来自世界各地(拉丁美洲、欧洲和亚洲)的学者和研究人员撰写的,通过展示社会可持续性与地方发展和平的不同社会、文化和政治多样性,可以获得更全球化的视角。它还考虑到2019冠状病毒病大流行的情况。为了实现这一目标,我们将首先从多维和跨学科的角度对这三个概念进行理论回顾,尊重不同背景的多样性。在二十世纪的最后三十年中,关于可持续发展的讨论集中于为后代确保一个更健康的自然环境的必要性;然而,直到二十世纪末,国际社会才开始认识到,除了环境保护之外,中心目标必须是提高人的能力,同时改善人口的生活质量。人类发展,被理解为人类素质的公平和永久的改善,被视为本身的目的——为了人类发展的进步,将确保与外部环境建立更健康的关系(Anand & Sen, 2000)。Biggeri和Ferrannini(2014)将发展定义为多维、多层次和动态的过程,涉及多个利益相关者以及多个本地和非本地关系;对于每一个地方发展战略,特别需要对话,所有政治行动者的共识,来自不同层次的公共行政部门的合作,以及公共和私营部门的联合工作(Di Pietro Paolo, 2003)。至关重要的是要承认,地方发展不仅仅取决于地方的努力;只有各个层面都参与进来,并朝着共同目标的实现保持一致,才能追求有效的发展轨迹(Biggeri & Ferrannini, 2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信