Statistical comparison of color model-classifier pairs in hematoxylin and eosin stained histological images

Mutlu Mete, U. Topaloglu
{"title":"Statistical comparison of color model-classifier pairs in hematoxylin and eosin stained histological images","authors":"Mutlu Mete, U. Topaloglu","doi":"10.1109/CIBCB.2009.4925740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Color is the most critical information for assessing histological images. However, in literature, there is no standard color space in which a particular color points are represented for computer vision tasks. In this paper, we evaluated 11 color models with three different learning schemas for their performance in classifying tumor-related colors. The color models we studied are CIELAB, CIELUV, CIEXYZ, CMY, CMYK, HSL, HSV, Hunter-LAB, NRGB, RGB, and SCT. With 11 color models, prediction accuracies of three well-known classifiers, namely SVMs, C4.5, and Naïve Bayes, are statistically compared on a large dataset of 3494 Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) stained histopathologic images. Surprisingly, experiment results show that in contrast to general assumptions, there is no single model that is better than others in every case. However, C4.5 outperformed other two classifiers by obtaining average F-measure of 0.9989. Of 11 color models, we suggest the pair of C4.5-SCT as the most accurate classification framework for tumor identification in HE stained histological images.","PeriodicalId":162052,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIBCB.2009.4925740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Color is the most critical information for assessing histological images. However, in literature, there is no standard color space in which a particular color points are represented for computer vision tasks. In this paper, we evaluated 11 color models with three different learning schemas for their performance in classifying tumor-related colors. The color models we studied are CIELAB, CIELUV, CIEXYZ, CMY, CMYK, HSL, HSV, Hunter-LAB, NRGB, RGB, and SCT. With 11 color models, prediction accuracies of three well-known classifiers, namely SVMs, C4.5, and Naïve Bayes, are statistically compared on a large dataset of 3494 Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) stained histopathologic images. Surprisingly, experiment results show that in contrast to general assumptions, there is no single model that is better than others in every case. However, C4.5 outperformed other two classifiers by obtaining average F-measure of 0.9989. Of 11 color models, we suggest the pair of C4.5-SCT as the most accurate classification framework for tumor identification in HE stained histological images.
苏木精和伊红染色组织学图像颜色模型-分类器对的统计比较
颜色是评估组织学图像最关键的信息。然而,在文献中,没有标准的颜色空间,其中一个特定的颜色点表示计算机视觉任务。在本文中,我们评估了具有三种不同学习模式的11种颜色模型在肿瘤相关颜色分类中的表现。我们研究的颜色模型有CIELAB、CIELUV、CIEXYZ、CMY、CMYK、HSL、HSV、Hunter-LAB、NRGB、RGB和SCT。利用11种颜色模型,在3494张HE染色的组织病理图像的大数据集上,对svm、C4.5和Naïve Bayes这三种知名分类器的预测准确率进行了统计比较。令人惊讶的是,实验结果表明,与一般假设相反,没有一个模型在任何情况下都比其他模型更好。然而,C4.5的平均f值为0.9989,优于其他两个分类器。在11种颜色模型中,我们认为C4.5-SCT对是HE染色组织学图像中最准确的肿瘤识别分类框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信