Effect of Conventional Tillage and Zero Tillage on Different Soil and Yield Parameters

Sushil Kumar, V. Rani, Anil . Kumar, R. Pannu, A. Mor
{"title":"Effect of Conventional Tillage and Zero Tillage on Different Soil and Yield Parameters","authors":"Sushil Kumar, V. Rani, Anil . Kumar, R. Pannu, A. Mor","doi":"10.56228/jart.2022.sp117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conservation and conventional tillage directly affects soil environment for crop production. Conservation tillage provides a layer of crop residue which increases soil fertility, soil erosion, leaching of fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides into the ground water. Studies conducted in different climate zones showed that no-tillage resulted in acidification of surface layer when continued for several years compared to conventional tillage. Some study shows Conservation tillage enhance water infiltration rate and reduce moisture evaporation from soil, while some other study stated slower water infiltration rate in no tillage soil then on tilled. surface tillage and no tillage instead of conventional tillage are to control soil erosion, enhance crop performance, and use energy more efficiently. Decomposition of crop residues kept on the soil surface possibly release allele-chemicals which further strengthen the inhibitory effects on weed seed germination and early growth and development of weed plant. As with impact of tillage on root distribution, no-tillage causes greater and deeper water accumulation in the soil profile and greater root growth. Higher labor, animal or equipment requirement is a major drawback of conventional tillage. Conservational tillage allows elimination of several operations, depending on the conservation tillage systems used. Observation of numerous studies reveals that zero-tillage is superior to conventional tillage resulting in higher yields. Similarly several studies reveals that crops grown under zero tillage have yields as similar as or better than those grown under conventional tillage.","PeriodicalId":418512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture Research and Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56228/jart.2022.sp117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation and conventional tillage directly affects soil environment for crop production. Conservation tillage provides a layer of crop residue which increases soil fertility, soil erosion, leaching of fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides into the ground water. Studies conducted in different climate zones showed that no-tillage resulted in acidification of surface layer when continued for several years compared to conventional tillage. Some study shows Conservation tillage enhance water infiltration rate and reduce moisture evaporation from soil, while some other study stated slower water infiltration rate in no tillage soil then on tilled. surface tillage and no tillage instead of conventional tillage are to control soil erosion, enhance crop performance, and use energy more efficiently. Decomposition of crop residues kept on the soil surface possibly release allele-chemicals which further strengthen the inhibitory effects on weed seed germination and early growth and development of weed plant. As with impact of tillage on root distribution, no-tillage causes greater and deeper water accumulation in the soil profile and greater root growth. Higher labor, animal or equipment requirement is a major drawback of conventional tillage. Conservational tillage allows elimination of several operations, depending on the conservation tillage systems used. Observation of numerous studies reveals that zero-tillage is superior to conventional tillage resulting in higher yields. Similarly several studies reveals that crops grown under zero tillage have yields as similar as or better than those grown under conventional tillage.
常规耕作与免耕作对不同土壤及产量参数的影响
保护性耕作和常规耕作直接影响作物生产的土壤环境。保护性耕作提供了一层作物残留物,增加了土壤肥力,防止土壤侵蚀,使肥料、杀虫剂和除草剂浸出到地下水中。在不同气候带进行的研究表明,与常规耕作相比,免耕作持续数年导致表层酸化。一些研究表明,保护性耕作提高了土壤水分入渗速率,减少了土壤水分蒸发,而另一些研究表明,免耕土壤水分入渗速率比耕作土壤慢。地表耕作和免耕代替传统耕作是控制水土流失、提高作物生产性能和提高能源利用效率的重要手段。作物秸秆在土壤表面的分解可能释放出等位基因化学物质,进一步加强了对杂草种子萌发和杂草植物早期生长发育的抑制作用。免耕对根系分布的影响与免耕对根系分布的影响一样,免耕对土壤剖面水分积累的影响更大、更深,对根系生长的影响更大。传统耕作的主要缺点是对劳动力、动物或设备的要求较高。根据所使用的保护性耕作系统,保护性耕作可以消除几种作业。大量研究表明,免耕优于常规耕作,产量更高。同样,几项研究表明,免耕栽培的作物产量与传统耕作栽培的产量相当,甚至更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信